« Notable Study on Hispanic Religion, Politics | Main | Notable Study -- Take Two »
April 25, 2007
The 'evangelical view of economics'
Are theological conservatives also economic conservatives? A study answers the question.
Of all the lines in the widely circulated letter against Richard Cizik's work on global warming, I found one section particularly surprising:
Cizik's disturbing views seem to be contributing to growing confusion about the very term, "evangelical." ... We believe some of [the] misunderstanding about evangelicalism and its "conservative views on politics, economics and biblical morality" can be laid at Richard Cizik's door.
As I've said before, I found that surprising because most evangelical activists I know of have been eager to define evangelical theologically or sociologically and oppose use of the word as a political descriptor. But while you can talk about trends in evangelical political behavior (which is quite a bit different than talking about "evangelical politics"), I was stumped on what the letter's signatories thought evangelical views on economics are. Granted, 50 years ago there was a strong anti-Communist streak in evangelical Protestantism. But today?
Well, I just found an answer, at least in part, in the journal Social Science Research. (More after the jump)
In the June 2007 issue, Pennsylvania State University sociologists Jacob Felson and Heather Kindell write about "The elusive link between conservative Protestantism and conservative economics." For the full article, you'll have to pay $30. But here's the abstract (emphasis mine):
Research on the political attitudes of conservative Protestants has yielded inconsistent results. We know that conservative Protestants (CPs) tend to be more socially conservative than members of other religious groups and have tended to vote Republican in recent years, but we are less certain of their attitudes toward the size and role of government in matters unrelated to religion. Despite theoretical expectations and qualitative research supporting a link between conservative Protestantism and conservative attitudes about the size and role of government, quantitative work has failed to find a consistent relationship. The present study interprets conservative Protestant issue preferences in the context of research on non-attitudes, arguing that we should not expect ideological constraint among the less educated segment of the population. However, among better educated members of the population, we should expect to find ideologically consistent attitudes. Results from the General Social Survey suggest that better-educated evangelical Protestants are consistently more economically conservative than other Protestants. Among Protestants with lower levels of education, there is no consistent relationship between conservative Protestantism and economic policy preferences. Since the better educated are disproportionately politically active, politicians may be especially likely to pay attention to their interests. This may help to explain why the Republican coalition between social and economic conservatives has endured for several decades and shows no signs of abating.
Since I didn't pay the $30, I can't tell if the study took into account that the better-educated evangelical Protestants are likely to have higher incomes--something that would no doubt also influence their economic views. But the bottom line here is that talking about the "evangelical view on economics" is even more problematic than talking about evangelical politics. There is a group that is both evangelical and economically conservative. And certainly it would be interesting to find out more about that group, and whether its influence is proportional to its size. But please don't confuse the part with the whole.
Comments
Frank Dobson is a very wealthy man - and though I have listened to him on the radio and found myself in agreement with him on some family dynamic issues, I think this move has shown out 'out there' he and his fellow wealthy preachers are from the rest of us.
I am not against wealth as such, I wouldn't mind being wealthy myself actually! But I don't find the results of the survey above very surprising. We are a very wide mix of economic and political beings, united in our love for Christ.
And Amen to that!
Posted By: alan | April 26, 2007 8:23 AM
Talk about confusion, the letter does that in multiples when it equates issues of serving the creation with a particular brand of politics. Have these folks gotten so far right that they are threatened by any diversity of opinion? My dad was a strong Evangelical in theology but a strong advocate for unions and the Democratic Party. He always said, "Do not get your C's mixed up; Christianity and Culture.
Posted By: Gary Sweeten | April 27, 2007 10:27 PM
First, if we look at the Early Church, and how they operated. Our view of gov't intervention would change. It is clear that the onus of taking care of people (economically, physically, etc.) is on us the Church, just like taking care of the poor, orphaned, widowed, and the Church of Jerusalem was required in the time of Paul. Watching the PBS documentary of the Mormons, it amazes me how well they respond to a crisis like Katrina, and the conversions that follow. And evangelicals do a good job too, but often we rely on the gov't to do our job. One side note, shouldn't our Christianity define how we look at and live in culture? Isn't that what this magazine is all about? I certainly think Dr. Henry would say that was the original intention. Soli Deo Gloria.
Posted By: andy | May 2, 2007 11:48 AM
Since I'm writing this comment so long after the blog entry was posted, there is a good chance my remarks will not be noticed, but I thought I would give it a try anyway. I'm the first author of the paper mentioned by Ted Olsen. We did control for income. If anyone would like a free copy of the study, I would be happy to send it to them.
Posted By: Jacob Felson | September 18, 2007 8:49 AM
The results are not surprising. Many of the lesser-educated evangelicals were probably minorities, who overwhelmingly vote for liberals and Democrats who will give them free stuff. They also often do not hear good expository preaching in their pulpits. Many of the better-educated evangelicals will be exposed to leaders who are more likely to have probably thought through the practical worldview implications of Biblical truth. Please don't dismiss this as being politically-incorrect.I am generalizing, but that is what a national survey, like this, does.
Posted By: D H | August 3, 2010 4:24 PM