What Is Gleanings?

At Christianity Today, we’re constantly tracking important developments in the church and the world. Often we use our network of reporters around the world (and for that, visit our main site). But we also monitor other news outlets, bloggers, newsmakers’ social media feeds, and countless other information streams. Gleanings compiles the most urgent and interesting items we’ve found, explains why you need to know about them, and gives you the background you need to understand them. It’s our snapshot of what God is doing in the world, hour by hour.

Free Newsletters

« If You Have Two Kidneys and Your Neighbor Has None . . . | Main | Muslims and Christians Together? »

October 10, 2007

Maybe the Sky Isn't Falling

New UN study says that reports of the world's death have been greatly exaggerated.

A new United Nations report, "State of the Future," points to signs of progress across many measures of human development. The document concludes, "People around the world are becoming healthier, wealthier, better educated, more peaceful, more connected, and they are living longer." According to an analysis by Stephen Moore:

World-wide illiteracy rates have fallen by half since 1970 and now stand at an all-time low of 18%. More people live in free countries than ever before. The average human being today will live 50% longer in 2025 than one born in 1955.

To what do we owe this improvement? Capitalism, according to the U.N. Free trade is rightly recognized as the engine of global prosperity in recent years. In 1981, 40% of the world's population lived on less than $1 a day. Now that percentage is only 25%, adjusted for inflation. And at current rates of growth, "world poverty will be cut in half between 2000 and 2015"--which is arguably one of the greatest triumphs in human history. Trade and technology are closing the global "digital divide," and the report notes hopefully that soon laptop computers will cost $100 and almost every schoolchild will be a mouse click away from the Internet (and, regrettably, those interminable computer games).

It also turns out that the Malthusians (who worried that we would overpopulate the planet) got the story wrong. Human beings aren't reproducing like Norwegian field mice. Demographers now say that in the second half of this century, the human population will stabilize and then fall.

Yet despite all this progress, much of what hear these days in the mainstream media seems designed to scare us about global warming, environmental destruction, crumbling families, rampant crime, Islamofascism, and global terror. And while these dangers may (or may not) be real, certainly it can't be un-Christian to give thanks to the One who rules unseen in the affairs of human beings, causing his rain to fall on the just and the unjust. Many of the causes of these good gifts result from the influernce of Christianity, including political freedom, economic growth, and the rise of modern science. Surely a person of faith can see the glass as half-full, at least sometimes. We don't always have to claim the sky is falling.

Granted, the world still has major problems (such as the fact that more than a billion people subsist on a dollar a day or less). But what does Christianity, which calls the poor blessed and offers mankind real peace, have to say to a world that increasingly feels rich and unthreatened? What do Christians who seek to meet felt needs to introduce people to Christ do when people feel no needs? If your main appeal is helping people to feel better in the here and now, what do you say when they already feel good? And given the fact that the church often grows amid suffering, what happens when there is no suffering? Yes, the kindness of God is intended to lead us to repentance, but sometimes it seems as if few are so led.

Certainly felt needs do not always match real needs. And Christianity teaches that our real, most basic need (whether we know it or not) is forgiveness of our sins in order to have life with God. No matter how much comfort and convenience ths world offers, it cannot give us a relationship with God. Only Christ can do that. How do we communicate the Good News in this context? It hasn't worked out too well in affluent Western Europe, has it?

One final thought: This talk of human progress and development is eerily reminiscent of talk a hundred or so years ago that the 20th century was to be the "Christian century." Then came the Great War. Then Hitler. Then Stalin. What started so brightly turned to chaos in the space of a few years. With the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and the decoding of the human genome (with all its potential for good and ill), may the same history not repeat itself in our day.

But there are no guarantees.

Comments

Jesus said that we will always have the poor. It's a pretty profound statement. On one hand, responding to the poor effectively really demonstrates the kingdom come. On the other hand, no ministry will eradicate poverty completely, far from it.

Certainly good news is worth celebrating, but I might add a few caveats to this report.

1. Though the report has a positive spin on literacy, life-span, and poverty; Guthrie includes global warming in his commentary. As I understand, last year the UN did affirm that global warming continues to be a great threat. Certainly the now opened Northwest passage is a frightening sign for the future.

2. While its certainly great that poverty is on the decline, the chasm between rich and poor does still seem to be growing. The rising tide is lifting some boats much faster than others, which may be anissue of injustice . And though things are improving; 10,000 children who die daily from starvation and preventable disease is still 10,000 too many.

3. Finally, isn't it a bit disturbing that we might bemoan the developing world's new health-wealth-freedom because it'll make it harder to evangelize? To me it seems that too often evangelicals are looking for excuses not to seek economic justice and compassion. We often elevate the great commisision to the exclusion of 2,000 other bible verses instructing us on how to treat the poor.

I found it interesting (but not necessarily surprising) the Guthrie chose an op-ed by Stephen Moore to quote from, rather than one of the many other articles about this report. Stephen Moore is much further to the right than most Americans. The organization he founded, Club for Growth, ran primary challenges against Republicans (most notably Sen. Specter) who voted against Bush's tax cuts, and Moore elevates tax cuts and deregulation to such a high pedestal that even many conservative Republicans are uncomfortable with him.

I encourage readers to link to the Moore op-ed. You will see that he uses the report as one more opportunity to nay-say the global warming threat and to peddle other far-right opinions.

That being said, I'm appreciative of Stan's essay. It's always nice to hear good news and he raises some good questions at the end.

Growing relative poverty can be ever more distressing to populations, and probably is. even more than absolute poverty, the stuff of killer revolutions, racist/racist-like beliefs and/or tedious totalitarianism.

Even if the last century proved the dangers of mass belief in the "One Big Idea" that solves everything for everybody, all the time; the idol of cosmic conspiracy theory, of feeling entitled, but left out unfairly (real and/or imagined), and the allure for godlike certitude in and about all things, doesn't appear to have gone away.