January 14, 2008 11:46AM
Fear Itself

Voters are afraid of the future. Should we be?


Stan Guthrie

We voters just can’t make up our minds. One day it’s Rudy. Then Huck. Hillary. Then Obama. Then Hillary again. Hey, here’s McCain, risen from the political dead!

Certainly one reason we can’t decide is because no one candidate fulfills all of our hopes and dreams. One has experience (sort of). Another has charisma. One speaks of conservative values but has other issues. Another champions those same values but is a . . . Mormon. Some say the only African-American candidate isn’t black enough, or the only woman candidate not womanly enough. They’re like the old commercial . . . everything you always wanted in a candidate—and less.

Another reason for voters’ fickleness is the economy. If you’re not covered at work, private health insurance is unaffordable for all but the wealthy. Gas and milk cost three bucks a gallon. Economic growth appears to be stagnating, and the growing mortgage crisis is hammering the real estate market and home values. Big-screen TVs and other luxury items aside, according to The Two-Income Trap, it generally takes two incomes to match the standard of living that one income provided a generation ago, and many people feel they are in danger of slipping from the ranks of the middle class.

Americans’ priorities are also in flux early into the primary season. The survey found voters to be in their darkest mood about the economy in 18 years, by some measures; 62 percent said they believed that the economy was getting worse, the highest percentage since the run-up to the recession in 1990. Seventy-five percent said they believed that the country had “seriously gotten off on the wrong track,” also similar to levels in the early 1990s, when such discontent fueled the presidential candidacy of Bill Clinton.

Worries about the economy now dominate the voters’ agenda, even more so than the war in Iraq, which framed the early part of this campaign. While change has emerged as an abstract rallying cry in the campaign debate, what the voters mean when they talk about change is clear — new approaches to the economy and the war, according to the poll.

Whatever their personal or policy differences, nearly all candidates are promising “change” in response to consumer angst. Now as the breadwinner in my family, I can understand those fears, and the desire to latch onto someone who promises to fix my financial problems. Sometimes it does seem as if the big corporations have an unfair advantage over consumers, and it feels good for government to “level the playing field.”

However, despite our present economic uncertainty, is all this worry really justified? The statistics, though troubling, are not as bad as the election-year rhetoric: Joblessness, at around 5 percent (up from 4.4 percent a year ago), remains low by historical levels. Adjusted for inflation (up 4.3 percent last year), gas and milk don’t cost as much relative to our rising incomes as they seem to. Those struggling with “subprime” mortgages, though their pain is real, are a relatively minor percentage of the American people. Despite the considerable challenges we face, the American economy remains the envy of the world.

Every generation worries about the economy (remember the “stagflation” of the seventies?), and while no one knows the future, I would guess that we have less to fear than most generations—even if recession comes. There are many other issues we also must consider, such as the war on terror, peace in the Middle East, abortion, the environment, and other priorities.

Beyond all that, as Christians, we should look at the coming election through the lens of faith, not fear. We are to trust God to provide, not the promises of politicians. As a certain nonpolitical leader once said:

“Therefore I tell you, do not be anxious about your life, what you will eat or what you will drink, nor about your body, what you will put on. Is not life more than food, and the body more than clothing? Look at the birds of the air: they neither sow nor reap nor gather into barns, and yet your heavenly Father feeds them. Are you not of more value than they? And which of you by being anxious can add a single hour to his span of life? And why are you anxious about clothing? Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow: they neither toil nor spin, yet I tell you, even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these. But if God so clothes the grass of the field, which today is alive and tomorrow is thrown into the oven, will he not much more clothe you, O you of little faith? Therefore do not be anxious, saying, 'What shall we eat?' or 'What shall we drink?' or 'What shall we wear?' For the Gentiles seek after all these things, and your heavenly Father knows that you need them all. But seek first the kingdom of God and his righteousness, and all these things will be added to you.

"Therefore do not be anxious about tomorrow, for tomorrow will be anxious for itself. Sufficient for the day is its own trouble.”

Thus, whatever the economy brings, we are to be busy doing his work—including helping those who really are struggling—trusting him to provide our needs each day.

Posted by Stan Guthrie on January 14, 2008 11:46AM

Comments

While I think you're right about relying on Christ, rather than worrying about the economy, I must admit that I'm a bit troubled by what you seem to suggest we should rely on Christ for. You say that it now takes two incomes to maintain a middle-class existence, and that this is a cause of concern for Christians; I'm left wondering what the late Francis Schaeffer, who so eloquently critiqued Americans' adherence to the myth of "personal peace and prosperity," would have thought. Schaeffer argued, in a manner strikingly reminiscent of the Port Huron Statement that was so important in forging the student movement of the 1960s, that this pursuit of "personal peace and prosperity," far from being a blessing of some sort, actually undermined the ability of the Church to practice true Christianity. Perhaps - just perhaps - if gas and milk both reached $10 a gallon, it might be a good thing for evangelical Christians, forcing us to reconsider our status as cultural insiders, and how that status relates to true love for God and neighbor.

Posted by: Adam Parsons at January 15, 2008

Your article conclusion with Jesus: “Therefore I tell you, do not be anxious about your life..." is very much to the point.
And the comment by Adam Parsons on Francis Schaeffer's outlook on so-called "personal peace and prosperity" is also applible.(I grew up on Schaeffer)
The truth is that Christ emphasized the Church - the Kingdom of God - the corporative body, even though it is essentualy made up of born-again believers. The second greatest Commandment "love your neighbor as yourelf" proves the point.
How do we get out of our modernist mind-set? Get acquainted with those believer elsewhere satisfied with little of the world's resources as long as they have Jesus. Go to www.persecution.com to get a real view. The majority of Christians today are in Asia and Africa suffering and dying for their faith. Little South Korea sends out more missionaries than all other countries except the U.S.(SBC).
And their people go to where the need is greatest and also dangereous.
In 2005 I went on a Philippine mission trip for a month riding bikes and motorcyles to small country churches with no air conditioning but people excited for the Lord.. It was a real blessing and I saw the Lord touch many lives. But I could hardly wait to get home and eat American-style food, enjoy smooth streets, and be cool in my AC.
I must admit to being more softer and less committed than I realized.
But only when we go to where God is working can we fulfill His "Go ye into all the world and preach the Gospel..."
Humbly submitted,
Pastor David

Posted by: David Logos at January 16, 2008

Post a comment






Remember Me?

(1500 characters max; you may use HTML tags for style)