Gathering the fruit of last fall's Muslim-Christian letters.
Remember those open-exchange letters last fall between Muslim and Christian leaders? The first, “A Common Word Between Us and You,” was signed by 138 Muslim scholars and clerics and called for a new level of engagement between the two faith groups based on what they said was the “common ground” between Islam and Christianity: love of God and love of neighbor.
The response, “Loving God and Neighbor Together,” was penned by scholars at Yale Divinity School and heartily affirmed the need for deeper understanding between the two faiths (though that letter focused more on relational bridge-building and less on theology). Some 500 Christian leaders signed the document, including pastors Bill Hybels and Rick Warren, missions expert Jonathan J. Bonk, National Association of Evangelicals’ president Leith Anderson, theologian John Stott, and CT editor in chief David Neff. (The letter was also met with criticism from prominent evangelical leaders.)
Now the two letters seem to be bearing their intended fruit, as next week Yale will be hosting a three-day conference bringing together 150 Christian and Muslim leaders for workshops and panel discussions on global interfaith relations. The conference was planned by the drafters of "Common Word" and the Yale Center for Faith & Culture’s director Miroslav Volf, who will be teaching a Yale course on religion and globalization this fall with Tony Blair.
The conference is one in a series intended to promote relational ties and peacemaking initiatives. The other conferences will be held at Cambridge (October), the Vatican (November), Georgetown (March 2009), and the Royal Aal al-Bayt Institute in Jordan (October 2009).
Next week’s conference and those following it will likely inspire similar disagreements as did the original letters about whether Christianity and Islam share as much “common ground” as the first letter suggested, and what our faithful response should be to calls for interfaith understanding. (Evangelism? Separation? Peacemaking? All of these in different contexts?) Fortunately, the evangelicals attending—David Neff, Nigerian pastor Tokunboh Adeyemo, Robert Schuller, and Warren Larson, director of the Zwemer Center for Muslim Studies at Columbia International University, among others—have already been thinking biblically about the implications of the letters, and should be able to translate the conference’s outcomes to those of us eager to see its results.
See CT's prior coverage of the letters:
Foreign Correspondence | by Jocelyn Green
Muslim and Christian leaders seek common ground in conciliatory letters.
Speaking Out: The Peacemaking Process | by J. Dudley Woodberry
A call to evangelicals to respond to a significant Muslim overture.
Wheaton College Administrators Remove Names from Christian-Muslim Statement | by Ted Olsen
'My eagerness to support the statement’s strengths caused me to move too quickly,' president Duane Litfin tells student newspaper.
Posted by Katelyn Beaty on July 22, 2008 4:29PM
Comments
There is a fundamental problem with the way the christian scholars responded. Besides taking their response as a unanimous Christian response, they failed to take cognizance that the genuine Christians had never seen the world as uncommon. The sharing of the gospel is the greatest expression of love for the common world in which the truth is presented for the good of the listeners. The listeners reserve the right to their response whether favorable or not. In fact, the presentation of the message of salvation in Jesus Christ brings the solution to the greatest human need - forgiveness of sin and the assurance of salvation. What is more good than to desire that we do not only share the temporary world but the eternal heaven that God had prepared for all that believe in Christ! A fundamental issue for them is calling for religious freedom that prohibits the Christian expression of genuine love; yet, insensitive to social and spiritual impact of the other religion. Genuine religious freedom is to allow each individual have access to information, freedom of choice and expression without trampling on the conscience, feeling and yearnings of the person's soul and yearnings. The greatest evil is ignoring and compelling the soul of individuals in their senses by a system, tradition or selfish motives. What these scholars are doing is nothing short of encouraging the later.
Posted by: Moses Audi,Ph.D. at July 23, 2008
So in essence everyone has decided to respectfully "agree to disagree" in neighborly love. This is actually a wise and positive start given the nature of the Theological discussions that are pending this body.
Posted by: TIMOTHY at July 23, 2008
As a missionary serving the Lord in French-speaking Europe since 1968, I am more than surprized to learn of the effort to "hold hands" intellectually with Muslims by conceding that there is common ground between Christians and Muslims. The citation of sourate 3.64 in the February article, accepted as good ground for common discussion, automatically excludes any common ground, for it is blatantly anti-trinitatian. Jesus-Christ is the only ground for discussion. Discussion doesn't usually bring Muslims to salvation; it is the Word shared with love and no compromise that does the job of conversion.
Too many Americans theologians sitting in their ivory towers don't know what Islam is all about. Come and see !
Posted by: Scott McCarty at July 25, 2008
1Jo 2:22 Who is the liar but the one who denies that Jesus is the Christ? This is the antichrist, the one who denies the Father and the Son.
Posted by: John W in TN at August 13, 2008
Post a comment