July 19, 2008 11:37PM
Crack up of Anglican Communion at hand, evangelicals say

Plus, the GAFCON primates' press release.


Timothy C. Morgan

This blog post has been moved. For the article, please see "Crackup of Anglican Communion at Hand, Evangelical Bishops Say."

Continue for the press release from GAFCON primates:


GAFCON responds to the Archbishop of Canterbury:

The Global Anglican Future Conference gathered leaders from around the Anglican Communion for pilgrimage, prayer and serious theological reflection. We are grateful to the Archbishop of Canterbury for engaging with the Jerusalem Statement and Declaration. We wish to respond to some of his concerns.

On faith and false teaching. We warmly welcome the Archbishop's affirmation of the Jerusalem Statement as positive and encouraging and in particular that it would be shared by the vast majority of Anglicans. We are however concerned that he should think we assume that all those outside GAFCON are proclaiming another gospel. In no way do we believe that we are the only ones to hold a correct interpretation of scripture according to its plain meaning. We believe we are holding true to the faith once delivered to the saints as it has been received in the Anglican tradition. Many are contending for and proclaiming the orthodox faith throughout the Anglican Communion. Their efforts are, however, undermined by those who are clearly pursuing a false gospel. We are not claiming to be a sinless church. Our concern is with false teaching which justifies sin in the name of Christianity. These are not merely matters of different perspectives and emphases. They have led to unbiblical practice in faith and morals, resulting in impaired and broken communion. We long for all orthodox Anglicans to join in resisting this development.

On the uniqueness of Christ. We are equally concerned to hear that 'the conviction of the uniqueness of Jesus Christ as Lord and God' is 'not in dispute' in the Anglican Communion. Leading bishops in The Episcopal Church, the Anglican Church of Canada, and even the Church of England have denied the need to evangelise among people of other faiths, promoted and attended syncretistic events and, in some cases, refused to call Jesus Lord and Saviour.

On legitimacy. In the current disorder in the Communion, GAFCON came together as a gathering of lay leaders, clergy and bishops from over 25 countries on the basis of their confession of the common historic Christian faith. They formed a Council in obedience to the word of God to defend the faith and the faithful who are at risk in some Anglican dioceses and congregations.

GAFCON, where the governing structures of many provinces were present, affirmed such a Council of the GAFCON movement as its body to authenticate and recognise confessing Anglican jurisdictions, clergy and congregations and to encourage all Anglicans to promote the gospel and defend the faith.

In their primates and other bishops, the assembly saw a visible connection to the catholic and apostolic Church and the evangelical and catholic faith which many have received from the Church of England and the historic see of Canterbury. It is this faith which we seek to affirm.

On authority. As the Virginia Report notes, in the Anglican tradition, authority is not concentrated in a single centre, but rather across a number of persons and bodies. This Council is a first step towards bringing greater order to the Communion, both for the sake of bringing long overdue discipline and as a reforming initiative for our institutions.

Whilst we respect territoriality, it cannot be absolute. For missionary and pastoral reasons there have long been overlapping jurisdictions in Anglicanism itself – historically in South Africa, New Zealand, the Gulf and Europe. In situations of false teaching, moreover, it has sometimes been necessary for other bishops to intervene to uphold apostolic faith and order.

On discipline. Finally, with regard to the Archbishop's concern about people who have been disciplined in one jurisdiction and have been accepted in another, we are clear that any such cases have been investigated thoroughly and openly with the fullest possible transparency. Bishops and parishes have been given oversight only after the overseeing bishops have been fully satisfied of no moral impediments to their action.

We enclose a response to the St Andrew's Draft Covenant. (See separate post).

We assure the Archbishop of Canterbury of our respect as the occupier of an historic see which has been used by God to the benefit of his church and continue to pray for him to be given wisdom and discernment.

Signed

The Most Rev Peter Akinola, Primate of Nigeria
The Most Rev Justice Akrofi, Primate of West Africa
The Most Rev Emmanuel Kolini, Primate of Rwanda
The Most Rev Valentine Mokiwa, Primate of Tanzania
The Most Rev Benjamin Nzmibi, Primate of Kenya
The Most Rev Henry Orombi, Primate of Uganda
The Most Rev Gregory Venables, Primate of The Southern Cone

Posted by Tim Morgan on July 19, 2008 11:37PM

Comments

What really is the purpose of the Lambeth Conference if no substantive dialogue and decision making is allowed. The Bishops who were no-shows may well have the right idea. How does an Orthodox Anglican in the US support the GAFCON organization?

Posted by: Richard Gamble Pugh at July 20, 2008

The liberals are simply trying to wait out and wear out the conservatives in hopes that the conservatives will concede to normalized homosexuality. It will never happen. Conservatives are wasting time by waiting. Secede and let the liberal wing die.

Posted by: Jim A at July 21, 2008

How does an evangelical in the Scottish Episcopal Church survive when all the Bishops appear to be liberal? We have nowhere alternative to worship and evangelicals are very scattered in this province. The liberal arm of this church rules and in some cases aggressively. Syncretism is prevalent and many are blinded by it.
We believe that the Lord has called us to be His witnesses in this church as do the others who have remained but we don't have rights for other oversight.
The people in the "pews" are the most important in this dialogue. They are the sheep and their shepherds are failing them. They teach error. No wonder the church dies.
Lambeth is all very well, but it's a Holy Huddle for many. We need Bishops and Priests to function in their God given roles as His Witnesses to the Authority of Scripture, the Truth of a life saving and life changing gospel which promotes the Lordship of Jesus Christ as Saviour and Lord. Which places God above tradition, and the Holy Spirit led life above reason, because God does sometimes ask of us things that seem illogical until after successful completion when we see why He did so.
Sadly it does look as if the church must ultimately split. Evangelicals and traditionalists have both been very patient with the liberal wing of the Church. But the time will come, or maybe has already come, when hard decisions must be made; not to please argumentative men and women, but to please God by being subject to His will for us as fallen human beings, needing the salvation so lovingly given in the Lord Jesus Christ.
So my family and I although sad to see a separate meeting of Bishops, understand the frustration of evangelicals in a liberal church and thank them all for standing up to be counted for the sake of the gospel.

Posted by: Lydia at July 22, 2008

To assume that only men, not God, cause division is to create the logical, but false and un-Scriptural, assumption that men can always achieve unity. Such efforts may produce an ecumenical and superficial sense of 'togetherness', but only at the expense of truth, integrity, and genuine pneumatological (Holy Spirit) unity.

Posted by: Dan S at July 23, 2008

Post a comment






Remember Me?

(1500 characters max; you may use HTML tags for style)

Verification (needed to reduce spam):