« Mike Gerson on the Current Incivility | Main | India Elections: No Hindutva Takeover »
May 17, 2009
Creation Care without the Baggage
Flourish conference teaches pastors to engage environmental needs without dividing their congregations.

Last week, evangelical creation care entered a new phase as key pastors, scientists, and thought leaders gathered near Atlanta for a "coming out party." That's what Jonathan Merritt called the gathering as he welcomed conferees to Flourish 09, hosted by Cross Pointe Church where Merritt serves on the staff with his father, senior pastor and former president of the Southern Baptist Convention James Merritt.
Like all debutantes, the leaders of Flourish were clearly self-conscious as they tried to forge a new identity in public for the first time. Flourish president and co-founder Rusty Pritchard was the first of many to declare, "I am not an environmentalist." For Pritchard, a natural resources economist who founded the environmental studies program at Emory University, that label is loaded with overtones of judgmentalism and apocalypticism. We don't need environmentalism for us to be perceived as judgmental, said Pritchard. If you want judgmentalism, "just come to my church."
What emerged from Pritchard's keynote talk was not a passion for the environment so much as a passion for people, their health and well-being, and particularly for social justice. If our abuse of the environment raises, for example, the rate of debilitating asthma attacks, then it is a compassion issue for the church.
It's not about recycling and reusing, said Pritchard, it's about clean water and clean air. It's about social justice.
What Pritchard was keen to avoid--what Flourish is keen to avoid--is polarizing environmental rhetoric, rhetoric borrowed on the Right from Sean Hannity and on the Left from Al Gore. "Our engaging with environmental issues doesn't need to start with politics," said Pritchard. "That is the thesis of this conference. We have to start somewhere other than climate politics. There is nothing more divisive."
And so the conference proceeded largely without a lot of attention to climate change politics and its attendant apocalypticism. The only exception was an illustrated lecture by National Wildlife Federation president Larry Schweiger, who let loose a fusillade of climate data, which likely overwhelmed rather than enlightened most in attendance.
Perhaps the biggest benefit of the conference was its line-up of pastors talking to pastors about how to promote environmental concern in their congregations without creating factions.
South Atlanta pastor Leroy Barber spoke of how his church worked to "green my 'hood." His parishioners live with all the unsightly and unsanitary things other Atlanta neighborhoods avoid: chemical plants, an auto impound lot from another municipality, a landfill, poor public transportation. He described his church's efforts to improve the lives of their neighbors through economic development, health and nutrition programs, and even pedestrian safety campaigns. "That's good news for the poor," he said.
Orlando pastor Joel Hunter talked about how he has worked to weave creation care into the general discipleship experience of those he ministers to. Hunter admonished those present to attach everything they do to Scripture, to present facts rather than clever opinions, and to tell stories of environmental action that illustrate and invite Christians to demonstrate neighbor love.
Boise, Idaho, Vineyard pastor Tri Robinson positioned himself as a regular guy: a rancher and a hunter and an evangelical pastor, he says. He doesn't wear Birkenstocks. If you're going to succeed in getting people like me to engage with creation care, said Robinson, you're going to have to do three things:
* show me it is biblical and right,
* show me why it is going to be good for my church,
* connect it to the kingdom of God (Isaiah 61 via Jesus' words in Luke 4:14ff).
Castle Rock, Colorado, pastor Rand Clark spoke about integrating creation care activities into church planting and evangelism.
Houston pastor Chris Seay promoted creation care as way to free ourselves from slavery to Mammon and materialism.
Host pastor James Merritt preached a model sermon setting forth the biblical case for creation care. It was Merritt's first sermon ever on the topic, and he was laying the foundation not only for the preaching of other pastors but his own teaching ministry as well.
Evangelicals have often criticized the environmental movement for worshiping the creation rather than the Creator. At Flourish 09, there was not the slightest hint of nature mysticism. The dominant spiritual message was the need for neighbor love and the social justice activity neighbor love entails.

A number of social justice ministries were represented at the conference. The most popular booth belonged to Land of a Thousand Hills Coffee, with its slogan--"Drink Coffee. Do Good."--and its endless urns of really good joe. The ministry helps Rwandan genocide survivors to form coffee-growing co-ops, then helps them speed their best beans to market where they command top prices. These co-op farmers typically increase their revenues by a factor of 4.5, exceeding the prices paid in fair-trade programs. Land of a Thousand Hills markets their product to and through churches.
Floresta told how its tree-planting efforts rehabilitate the soil and water sources that rural people need to live. (Watch for an upcoming Christianity Today article on Floresta's work on the Haiti-Dominican Republic border.)
Pastor Tri Robinson put it bluntly: "Not caring about the creation is killing people." The clear message of the conference: restoring creation restores life, restores people to health, and demonstrates Christian love.
Previously: "Can We Separate Creation Care from Political Action?"
Tomorrow: "The Creator, Not the Crisis: The Theology of Flourish"
Comments
Love Land of a Thousand Hills Coffee. It really is some of the best coffee around.
Posted By: Adam S | May 17, 2009 7:16 PM
How can creation "flourish" if the caretakers in their attempt to be PC reject the mountains of peer-reviewed science that clearly warns of the greatest threat to creation. I don't get that.
Posted By: James | May 18, 2009 5:55 AM
Are the Flourish folks going to put audio clips online for download?
Don Bosch
evangelicalecologist.com
evaneco@gmail.com
Posted By: Don | May 18, 2009 9:11 AM
I like that social justice and creation care are being used together. It brings a sense of wholeness to the discussion.
Also bridging the pro-life into pro-"whole" life is a great concept.
I'm glad this conference happened. We've needed it.
Posted By: Garet | May 18, 2009 1:16 PM
I think this report shows nicely how authority works in evangelical life. If the president of the National Wildlife Foundation comes in with a power point filled with information, it's probably falling on deaf ears. This would be true, I would imagine, if you brought in a panel of scientists. Scientists and their data have little to no authority in front of an evangelical audience. But they will perk up when you start using Scripture and tell them that pastors approve of the given position.
I have a friend who attends a very large evangelical church, who was very anti-Big Bang. But then Hugh Ross with Reasons to Believe came to his church and said that the Big Bang was Biblical. So, now he accepts the Big Bang theory. This occurred in his church by pastoral invitation. If you do not enter in by those lines of authority (pastoral/biblical), you won't be heard.
I don't think non-Christians understand that.
Posted By: Ryan | May 18, 2009 2:21 PM
I applaud our friends at Flourish for a successful conference and in particular for attracting the attention of Mr. Neff and the folks at Christianity Today who we hope will now begin to lead this effort.
I concur with Adam's comment above, however, that the apparent attempt to downplay climate change in this context is starting to sound like evangelical political correctness. Mr. Neff himself signed the Evangelical Climate Initiative's document a couple of years ago(http://christiansandclimate.org/learn/call-to-action/)in which he along with the many other signatories affirmed that a)human induced climate change is real; b)its consequences will be significant and will hit the poor the hardest; c)Christian moral convictions demand that we respond; and d)the need to act is urgent.
We should by all means be biblical and nonconfrontational in our approach - but let's not water down the message at the same time. That helps no one, least of all the poor who are already suffering the effects of climate change around the world.
Posted By: Ed Brown | May 20, 2009 10:16 AM
Ryan: "Scientists and their data have little to no authority in front of an evangelical audience. But they will perk up when you start using Scripture and tell them that pastors approve of the given position."
-- This anti-intellectual strain of evangelicalism threatens to take the evangelical church the way of the Know-Nothing Party. So sad. God gave us brains. You'd think He meant for us to use them.
Posted By: Christian Lawyer | May 20, 2009 11:17 PM
This started out sounding good. But then I read some very ill-informed comments that reflect the state of ignorance, including of Mr. Neff if the description is correct.
Is seems much Christian leadership is sorely out-of-date or relies wholly on news media.
Dr. John Chrisy, who was an IPCC lead author, stated in February that "Our ignorance about the climate system is enormous, and policy makers need to know that. This is an extremely complex system, and thinking we can control it is hubris."
His concern is for the effects of wrong, useless and harmful policies on the poor of the world. He is featured in this video which addresses that problem.
http://video.google.fr/videoplay?docid=-4123082535546754758
Posted By: Michael Snow | May 22, 2009 11:48 AM
Interestingly, the President of the National Wildlife Federation is a devout evangelical Christian. But apparently climate facts are just too overwhelming (or "divisive" according to Pritchard?) to be illuminating
And why the need to denounce "birkenstocks"? I know hundreds of environmentalists, and none of them as far as I know wear the shoes/sandals/whatever they are..
Posted By: walden | May 22, 2009 1:53 PM