March 29, 2011 3:14PM
Supreme Court to Weigh Churches' Employment Rights

Adelle M. Banks, Religion News Service

The Supreme Court agreed Monday to consider whether a teacher who was fired from a religious school is subject to a "ministerial exception" that can bar suits against religious
organizations.

The case involves an employment dispute between a Michigan school and a teacher who is defended by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

Lawyers for the Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School in Redford, Mich., argue that courts have long recognized the First Amendment doctrine that often prevents employees who perform religious functions from suing religious organizations.

They asked the court to determine whether it extends to teachers at a religious school who teach a secular curriculum but also teach religion classes and lead students in prayer.

A lower court sided with the school and against fired teacher Cheryl Perich, citing the ministerial exception. But last March, the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the decision, saying it did not apply because Perich spends most of her time teaching secular topics.

The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, which is representing the school, said federal appeals courts are divided on the limits of the ministerial exception and the Supreme Court's consideration is groundbreaking.

"If `separation of church and state' means anything, it means the government doesn't get to pick religious teachers," said Luke Goodrich, deputy national litigation director at the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty.

The EEOC has expressed concern that a ruling against Perich could lead to religious organizations being shielded from all suits filed by staffers "simply by characterizing all of their duties as religious."

Share |

Posted by Sarah Pulliam Bailey on March 29, 2011 3:14PM

Comments

"If `separation of church and state' means anything, it means the government doesn't get to pick religious teachers,"

And it also means that no church or religious organization should be allowed to steal tax payers money and have tax exempt status and tax breaks.

Posted by: Corey Mondello at March 31, 2011

All "separation of church and state" means is that the state will not establish a religion nor tell religious organizations what to do! The tax exempt status is because of all the social work churches do for their communities; i.e., soup kitchens, homeless shelters, food banks, clothes closets, etc. The people's tithing go for these kind of things.

Posted by: Debra at April 4, 2011

Churches and religious institutions have value to society beyond their 'good works'.

Posted by: Christian at May 5, 2011