What Is Gleanings?

At Christianity Today, we’re constantly tracking important developments in the church and the world. Often we use our network of reporters around the world (and for that, visit our main site). But we also monitor other news outlets, bloggers, newsmakers’ social media feeds, and countless other information streams. Gleanings compiles the most urgent and interesting items we’ve found, explains why you need to know about them, and gives you the background you need to understand them. It’s our snapshot of what God is doing in the world, hour by hour.

Free Newsletters

« Lifeway Declines SBC Request to Bar NIV from Stores | Main | TBN Embroiled in 'Sordid' Family Lawsuit »

February 17, 2012

UK Human Rights Head: 'Law Stops at the Door of the Temple'

Outrage as official says exemptions to antidiscrimination laws are like Shari'ah law.

TrevorPhillips.jpg

The chairman of the United Kingdom’s Equality and Human Rights Commission has stirred up some debate after stating that religious exemptions to antidiscrimination laws should be limited to houses of worship.

Trevor Phillips, speaking during a debate organized by the Religion and Society Research Program, also compared Christian groups seeking exemptions from equality laws to Muslims who want to implement Shari‘ah law in parts of Britain.

"The law stops at the door of the temple as far as I'm concerned," he said. "Institutions have to make a decision whether they want to [provide public services under public rules] … but you can’t say 'because we decide we’re different then we need a different set of laws'."

Phillips referred to several cases where religious groups have protested requirements that they not discriminate on sexual grounds, including Catholic adoption agencies and the owners of a Christian bed and breakfast who were ordered to pay damages after turning away gay couples.

"To me there's nothing different in principle with a Catholic adoption agency, or indeed Methodist adoption agency, saying the rules in our community are different and therefore the law shouldn't apply to us," Phillips said. "Why not then say Shari'ah can be applied to different parts of the country? It doesn't work."

The remarks drew almost instant criticism. George Carey, the former Archbishop of Canterbury, called the statement "ridiculous."

"We are a democracy in which Christianity is established in the Church of England and a nation profoundly influenced by this faith in its Catholic and Anglican heritage," he said. "We need lawmakers to respect this heritage and seek accommodation wherever a strongly held faith seems to clash with new legislation."

Andrea Williams, director of the Christian Legal Center, said Phillips’ assertion was "inflammatory" and "intolerant," adding that Phillips "fails to understand the nature of faith and what inspires faith and what makes agencies like Catholic adoption agencies so selfless."

However, the National Secular Society’s Keith Porteous Wood sided with Phillips. "There is no such thing as partial equality, and every time an exemption is made, someone else’s rights are compromised."

Phillips later dismissed the criticism and said his comments were not meant to be controversial. "You would have to really work hard to make what I said 'inflammatory."

In August, CT reported on Phillips’ assertion that though Christians face discrimination, politically motivated faith groups often blow it out of proportion.

Comments

I think in some ways this is a storm in a teacup; the fact is there is a growing secularisation in Britain, this isn't something new though it has been going on for decades. As a Christian, I don't feel that I am persecuted in living as a Christian in the UK, nor do I feel particularly threatened by secularism either. The UK, like many wealthy liberal societies is pluralistic, multi-cultural and cosmopolitan; whether you like it or not this is a growing reality for millions of people around the globe. We can learn from other people, instead of being narrow-minded, and if I respect someone else's point of view, without having to necessarily agree with it, perhaps they will respect my belief in God and my Christian values; it's all about common respect!

As a Christian in the UK I have a very different perception than Tim. I agree to a point and share his optimism for common respect, but the issue is not whether we can just get along as I do not feel that our beliefs are being respected. Legislation is being drafted to take away the ability to agree to disagree and Christians are being prosecuted for holding to their beliefs when it appears to discriminate against others. Holding to the Biblical worldview is not about being narrow minded. Multi culturalism is a fact and there is no denying that; however, right and wrong are not cultural or relative concepts. The Church is not free to hold to God's commands and be obedient when it risks prosecution when it offends those who deny God. It may appear to be minimal at present but comments like this demonstrate the growing problem and the mindset that is opposed to religious freedom in this country.

Christians seem to be missing the main point. Both in the U.S. contraception debate and in this case, the question has been framed in terms of the provision of "public services". Once framed in this way, it is a short step to argue that those providing such services should follow "public rules". The problem is that, for the Christian, caring for the poor, providing health care, and assisting with adoptions are not "public services". They are essential to the Christian mission. If governments wish to have a share in such services, they should be welcomed. But we need to make it clear that they are on our turf, not the other way around.
Of course, Christians need to do a much more complete job of providing such services.