« Shooting at California Christian College Leaves Seven Dead (UPDATED) | Main | Faith on the Decks of the Titanic »
April 10, 2012
Student Coalition Opposes Vanderbilt’s Non-discrimination Policy (Updated)
Eleven groups will attempt to register, despite leadership requirements that violate Vanderbilt’s policy.
Eleven religious student groups at Vanderbilt University have united to reapply for registered status in the school, even though their religious requirements for leaders violate Vanderbilt’s non-discrimination policy.
The coalition, calling itself Vanderbilt Solidarity, said in a statement that each group “is a faith-based group dedicated to sharing the light of the Gospel of Jesus Christ on campus. As such, we simply cannot allow those who do not share our faith to lead our ministries, as Vanderbilt now demands.”
The members of the coalition include: Asian American Christian Fellowship, Beta Upsilon Chi, Bridges International, Christian Legal Society, Cru, Every Nation Ministries, Fellowship of Christian Athletes, Graduate Christian Fellowship, Lutheran Student Fellowship, Medical Christian Fellowship, and Navigators.
Last fall, Vanderbilt placed several faith-based groups on provisional status for being noncompliant with its non-discrimination policy, Christianity Today reported. It began enforcing the policy after Beta Upsilon Chi, a Christian fraternity, was accused of dismissing a student because of his sexual orientation.
Vanderbilt updated its non-discrimination policy in early March, stating that all “registered student organizations must be open to all students as members and must permit all members in good standing to seek leadership posts.” The policy does make an exemption for single-sex organizations, including fraternities and sororities.
“Most perplexing, a university founded by Methodists is prohibiting religious groups from selecting religious leaders while simultaneously allowing fraternities and sororities to discriminate in selecting their leaders and members,” Vanderbilt Solidarity said in its statement. “If Vanderbilt will give fraternities and sororities a broad exemption from its policy, why won’t it give religious groups a narrow exemption?”
A few weeks after the policy was updated, Vanderbilt Catholic, one of the school’s largest student religious groups, announced it would leave campus at the end of the year because of the policy. “Our purpose has always been to share the Gospel and proudly to proclaim our Catholic faith,” Rev. John Sims Baker, chaplain of Vanderbilt Catholic, told The Tennessean. “What other reason could there be for a Catholic organization at Vanderbilt?”
Vanderbilt Solidarity commended Vanderbilt Catholic in its statement, as well as the St. Thomas More Society, which intends to follow Vanderbilt Catholic’s course, the coalition wrote.
UPDATE (April 11): In a post on its blog, InterVarsity at Vanderbilt--which represents the Asian American Christian Fellowship, Graduate Christian Fellowship, and Medical Christian Fellowship student groups--denied being a part of any "protest" movement against the university.
"Our turning in an application for registration along with other student groups who have walked with us through this year has been called a 'protest' move and, unfortunately, could be interpreted as an attempt by us to manipulate the university," InterVarsity posted. "We intentionally invited further dialogue and relationship with the university. Our constitution retains faith-based requirements for leadership because we are a Christian organization. However, our cover letter to the university and our constitution were written from a posture of trying to live out who we authentically are (hopefully lovingly) and not primarily as a power move or protest."
Comments
Let us see, a Methodist university has been allowing the opposing religion, a Catholic group on its campus for years but when a homosexual tries to join a Christian group, the university screams discrimination. Interesting. The way to get around this practicing homosexual joining a Christian group so he can infiltrate and tear it appart or force the group to accept them is to not put the joiner in good standing within the group so he can't be a leader. It says this in the University's own statement. This is how the homosexuals split mainline churches apart by infiltration and demanding they be accepted as a Christian. It's their technique for conquering their enemy and to be accepted by their enemy. And, yes, Christianity is their enemy because it demands they leave their sexual religion behind to follow Jesus.
Posted By: Original Anna | April 10, 2012 8:59 PM
Ann, The gospel is not a religious denomination. Catholics and Methodists, along with many other denominations, teach and preach the virgin conception, Christ's birth, Christ is the Son of God, his teaching and healing, arrest and abuse, crucifiction, and resurrection; and salvation may only be obained through Christ.
On your other point, it does seem contradictory that the Christian organizations on campus must be open to anyone leading, yet other organizations do not. It is okay for a gay organization to reject someone who is not gay, believes homosexuality is a sin and a choice, and rejects objectives and standards of the organization - isn't that the same thing? If they insist someone embraces the belief of their organization, why is it a violoation of policy for Christian organizations to do the same?
Posted By: Kathi | April 11, 2012 11:44 AM
I pray those students will not back down. Be ready to form an independent organization off campus organization, but make them kick you off campus rather than back down for doing what is right. The bible says we will be persecuted for our beliefs, and if we do get persecuted it only builds up our faith.
DON'T back down!!! NEVER COMPROMISE THE BIBLE!!!!
Posted By: John | April 17, 2012 12:37 AM
This is an example of IV's serious problems. The organization seems to be committed to blending into the World as much as possible, and to regard its Christianity as something of an embarassment, to be excused rather than proclaimed. Even Christian organizations that *do* allow non-Christian leadership-- indeed even student organizations that aren't even Christian--- should protest the university's attack on Christians. Instead, IV pleads for mercy.
Posted By: Eric Rasmusen | April 19, 2012 9:31 PM
Eric, I think that you have misunderstood the situation. IV is not backing down from its requirement that its leaders be Christians that are committed to following the Scriptures in all areas, including sexual behavior. They seem to be objecting the label of their application for registration as a "protest".
Posted By: Greg | April 24, 2012 10:30 PM
So, does that mean that the "GIA" religious organizations on every campus across the fruited plains let anti-global warming believers and anti-green peace activists lead their organizations? How about the black clubs (secular religion), will they now have a "white" person to lead their organizations?
Posted By: klg1956 | April 28, 2012 6:42 PM
The Bible promises there will be persecution, in fact Jesus and all of his disiples were. Why not just meet at a public place on campus. It will only make their groups more visible. In Acts chapter 4 it says we can defy authority when they go against the bible.
Posted By: Andy | April 30, 2012 4:12 PM