« Court: Texas Can Bar Planned Parenthood For Now | Main | Fate Uncertain for Chen, Blind Lawyer-Activist, in China »
May 1, 2012
United Methodists Vote to End Guaranteed Clergy Appointments
Clergy appointments have been guaranteed since the 1950s.
In a move that will give bishops more flexibility to remove ineffective pastors, the United Methodist Church voted on Tuesday to end guaranteed clergy appointments.
Clergy appointments have been guaranteed since the 1950s, when they were instituted to protect ministers from discrimination or arbitrary abuse, supporters say. But critics say those original goals have helped mediocre clergy retain their posts. A commission studying the appointments said a more "nimble" process was necessary.
We Chang, a Belmont, Mass., pastor, argued unsuccessfully for the UMC reconsider the issue, United Methodist News Service reported.
"We have just done away with the security of appointment," he said, "that allowed us to have much gender and racial justice in terms of our appointments."
But Ken Carter, a district superintendent from North Carolina, thought the vote should stand and the focus should not be on providing guaranteed appointments.
"We want to place the emphasis on the mission -- making disciples of Jesus of Christ for the transformation of the world," he said.
The Study of Mission Commission recommended the change in policy, as the UMC searches for ways to stanch a decades-long decline in U.S. membership.
"We acknowledge the difficulties associated with this vision such as uncertainty, loss of security, caring for those in employment transitions, concern about episcopal authority, and loss of historic protections," the commission wrote in its report to the General Conference. "We feel strongly, however, that this vision is critical for the fulfillment of the church's mission."
Comments
It will be interesting to see how this will enhance our churches or if it will in effect hurt them. Bishops have always had the ability to move a less then efficient pastor to a smaller charge or to help them become more effective. One of the problems I see could come from groups in a church who want to be in control and will cause their appointed pastor to look bad as he or she tries to change the culture. Sometimes just keeping the doors open in a declining area is progress. I know that sometimes bad stuff happens to good pastors so I hope this will be dealt with grace and love.
Posted By: Rev. Dr. Ron Perceful | May 3, 2012 12:32 PM
Good for them. Good to see some accountability.
Posted By: Alan Paul | May 4, 2012 10:27 AM
And Methodists wonder why their churches are dying? If your pastor lacks the gifts of ministry, people will leave. It's just that simple. In the Bible, churches were independent and autonomous. Denominational bureaucracy is not biblical!
Posted By: Eddie B | May 7, 2012 2:00 PM
Actually, Paul was apparently an overseer of various churches. If you read his letters to the churches in Corinth, Galatia, etc, he is complimenting them on certain things, and correcting them on others. Read 1Cor chapter 5 for example, or the first verse in Galatians chapter 1. There are lots of examples of this.
Posted By: casey | May 7, 2012 4:23 PM