What Is Gleanings?

At Christianity Today, we’re constantly tracking important developments in the church and the world. Often we use our network of reporters around the world (and for that, visit our main site). But we also monitor other news outlets, bloggers, newsmakers’ social media feeds, and countless other information streams. Gleanings compiles the most urgent and interesting items we’ve found, explains why you need to know about them, and gives you the background you need to understand them. It’s our snapshot of what God is doing in the world, hour by hour.

Free Newsletters

« Eviction Notice Given To Mars Hill Satellite Campus | Main | Lady Gaga, Justin Bieber Beat On Twitter By Evangelical Leaders »

June 5, 2012

Another Legal Challenge To Public Crosses Fails Over Taxpayer Standing

Supreme Court rulings which felled high-profile legal challenge to clergy housing allowance also undercut atheist's challenge to Illinois' Bald Knob Cross.

Jeremy Weber

Legal challenges related to religious symbols in public settings continue to be dismissed over issues of taxpayer standing.

Yesterday the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed an atheist activist's attempt to stop state funding of the restoration of Bald Knob Cross, an Illinois tourist attraction, because the activist lacks taxpayer standing according to recent Supreme Court decisions. In Hein v. Freedom from Religion Foundation Inc., the Supreme Court ruled in 2007 that taxpayers can bring Establishment Clause challenges when funds are spent under legislative decisions but not administrative decisions, explains Religion Clause.

This limitation on church-state lawsuits was strengthened when the Supreme Court dismissed a challenge in April 2011 to Arizona's tax-credit-for-scholarship-donations program. CT reported how the Arizona ruling undercut a high-profile legal challenge to the longstanding housing allowance enjoyed by clergy. The Seventh Circuit also rejected a challenge to the National Day of Prayer in April 2011 over issues of taxpayer standing.

CT has spotlighted Supreme Court tussles over public crosses, as well as debate over whether memorial crosses should be considered secular.

posted by Jeremy Weber | Comments (2)

Share thisShare this post

Comments

The FFRF challenge to the ministerial housing allowance (IRC 107) has not been felled by Supreme Court rulings.

An earlier challenge was withdrawn by mutual consent of the parties.

A current challenge is awaiting the Court's ruling on "standing".

That ruling could be made any day now. I'm hoping that "standing" is granted and the challenge is allowed to proceed on its merits.

Posted By: Robert Baty | June 5, 2012 11:52 AM

Its remarkable just how much time and money atheists will spend to fight against someone they don't believe exists...OR...maybe they do believe He exists and they just don't want to answer to Him ?

Posted By: Fred | June 7, 2012 2:38 PM

Post a comment:

Verification (needed to reduce spam):