Who cares what Ken Ham has to say? He knows far less than Waltke and Enns about original languages and far less about science than Collins. Although I'm not convinced of evolution as explanatory for the whole picture (especially the Cambrian Explosion which drove Gould to come up with an unfalsifiable and ridiculous hypothesis to explain it away), evolution is not heretical unless we are considering Augustine, NT Wright, William Lane Craig, Alister McGrath, John Polkinghorne and Wolfhart Pannenberg are heretics now.

Augustine believed in a young earth created instantaneously. As for the others, yes, if they believe in evolution, they are heretics. Evolution destroys the gospel, plain and simple.

Chris Nelson, you should read Augustine's work instead of just what others say about him and his writings. Creation ex nihilio is not the same as everything created instantaneously AND staying that way. A good synoposis of his positions is below (not my synoposis, I would have been far wordier).
"Augustine wrestled with Genesis 1-2 throughout his career. There are at least four points in his writings where he attempts to develop a detailed, systematic account of how these chapters are to be understood, including his work The Literal Meaning of Genesis which was written between 401 and 415 AD. Augustine discerns the following themes in his reading of Scripture and weaves them together into his account of creation. God brought everything into existence in a single moment of creation. Yet the created order is not static. God endowed it with the capacity to develop. Augustine uses the image of the dormant seed to help his readers grasp this point. God creates seeds, which will grow and develop at the right time. Augustine asks his readers to think of the created order as containing divinely embedded causalities that emerge or evolve at a later stage. Yet Augustine has no time for any notion of random or arbitrary changes within creation. The development of God’s creation is always subject to God’s sovereign providence.

Augustine argues that the first creation account (Genesis 1:1-2:3) cannot be interpreted in isolation but must be set alongside the second creation account (Genesis 2:4-25), as well as every other statement about the creation found in Scripture. For example, Augustine suggests that Psalm 33:6-9 speaks of an instantaneous creation of the world through God’s creative Word, while John 5:17 points to a God who is still active within creation. God created the world in an instant but continues to develop and mold it, even to the present day. This leads Augustine to suggest that the six days of creation are not to be understood chronologically. Rather, they are a way of categorizing God’s work of creation. They provide a framework for the classification of the elements of the created world so that they might be better understood and appreciated.

Certain biblical passages, he insisted, can legitimately be understood in different ways. The important thing is that these interpretations must not be wedded to prevailing scientific theories . Otherwise, the Bible becomes a prisoner of what was once believed to be scientifically true."

There are only two roadblocks facing Biologos:

(1) The Bible

(2) Evolutionary textbooks and websites

Biologos' main message -- that Evolution is compatible with Christianity -- can be clearly defeated from either or both directions.

Romans 5:12 clearly says that "Therefore as by one man sin entered the world, and death by sin, and thus death spread to all men, because all sinned." Although the passage speaks of human death, one could legitimately, I think, understand that there was no death before Adam's sin, and therefore no millennia of species dying out as they gave rise to other species. Plus, Genesis states that "everything reproduced after its own kind," and that God's creation was "good." I see no room for the concept that species changed into other species. We are not talking here about micro-evolution, or adaptation, viz., small changes within species. Those have been observed, & do not contradict Scripture. I view those who try to combine the Bible and evolution, not as heretics, but as people who are trying to court friendship with the world. Similarly with those evangelicals who are jumping on board the Global Warming train.