What Is Gleanings?

At Christianity Today, we’re constantly tracking important developments in the church and the world. Often we use our network of reporters around the world (and for that, visit our main site). But we also monitor other news outlets, bloggers, newsmakers’ social media feeds, and countless other information streams. Gleanings compiles the most urgent and interesting items we’ve found, explains why you need to know about them, and gives you the background you need to understand them. It’s our snapshot of what God is doing in the world, hour by hour.

Free Newsletters

« Should Sex Between Church Employees and Teens Be Classified as Rape? | Main | 'Grave' Theology Debate Continues: Leading Apologist Assessed in Southern Baptist Journal »

February 14, 2013

Newtown 'Debacle' Revives Identity Debate as LCMS Elections Loom

(UPDATED) Forced apology for Sandy Hook prayer vigil reopens old wounds for an often politically divided denomination.

Update (Feb. 19): LCMS president Matthew C. Harrison and Newtown pastor Rob Morris have issued a joint statement of unity:

"By the grace of God, we have worked through a very challenging situation. It has been our deepest mutual concern in dealing with one another to be faithful to Christ, our respective vocations, and to each other as brothers. Our dealings have been marked throughout with patience, kindness, and love. We implore the church to do likewise.

We have mutually forgiven each other where we have fallen short.

We are reconciled.

We are at peace."

-----

(RNS) After causing a "debacle" by asking a local reverend to apologize after praying at an interfaith vigil for victims of the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre in Newtown, Conn., Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod (LCMS) president Matthew Harrison has sparked a media firestorm with charges that the 2.4 million-member denomination was intolerant, insensitive, or both.

Now Harrison’s handling of the Newtown service is almost certain to be a factor as he seeks re-election in July when delegates gather in St. Louis for their triennial convention.

The Missouri Synod’s constitution prohibits members from taking part in worship services that blend the beliefs and practices of Lutherans with those of other faiths and Christian denominations.

But in 2004 the synod—under Harrison's predecessor Gerald Kieschnick—issued guidelines for participating in public events, including the acknowledgment of “once-in-a-lifetime” situations which “can be evaluated only on a case-by-case basis.”

“I did not believe my participation to be an act of joint worship, but one of mercy and care to a community shocked and grieving an unspeakably horrific event,” Rob Morris, pastor of Newtown's Christ the King Lutheran Church, explained in his apology. “However, I recognize others in our church consider it to constitute joint worship and I understand why. I apologize where I have caused offense by pushing Christian freedom too far.”

This is not the first time an LCMS president has faced pushback for enforcing the constitution. In 2001, a similar moment threatened the administration of Kieschnick, after he allowed a pastor, David Benke, to take part in an interfaith prayer vigil at Yankee Stadium in the weeks after the 9/11 attacks.

Conservative elements in the church called for Kieschnick’s removal, and Benke was eventually suspended in June 2002. Benke was later reinstated, but the episode dogged Kieschnick’s presidency. He lost re-election in 2010.

In a recent email newsletter, Kieschnick said “the overwhelming majority of people both in and beyond the LCMS who hear the request for apology and/or removal shake their heads in disgust and dismay.”

The controversy over the Newtown vigil had flared on the Internet even before the Dec. 16 service as conservative voices within the synod began criticizing him online for planning to participate.

Morris defended himself on the Steadfast Lutherans website, citing the disclaimer “that no clergy member present was endorsing the religions of others, or recanting any portion of their own beliefs, but only offering their love, care, and prayer for their families and communities.”

But Timothy Rossow, a pastor from Naperville, Ill., and Steadfast Lutherans’ leader, compared the disclaimer to a man whose wife had caught him with a prostitute and who offered her an excuse that “it was OK because before we had sex we each claimed that this had no bearing on any other physical relation that we have, right or wrong, with any other person.”

One commenter said Morris’ participation in the service “does more harm to the souls of the survivors than any gunman could ever do.”

“Does anyone else agree that Pastor Morris’ action is more abominable than those committed by the gunman?” the commenter asked.

“Yes I do,” Rossow answered in a post that followed. “The gunman killed the body which lasts for 70 or 80 years. … False teaching and practice kills the soul which lives for eternity in heaven or hell.”

But some pastors and academics—most of whom did not want to speak publicly—reacted angrily to Harrison’s moves against the Connecticut pastor.

“I would hope that this latest action by Harrison would be sufficient to lead LCMS electors to remove him from the office of president and to replace him with someone who is wiser and more evangelical,” said the Rev. Matthew Becker, interim pastor at Immanuel Lutheran Church in Michigan City, Indiana.

The Rev. Scott Seidler, pastor of Concordia Lutheran Church in Kirkwood, Missouri, sent a message to his congregation saying that “with thousands of other pastors and church leaders from across our denomination, I find President Harrison’s actions to be both outside the bounds of his denominational authority and inconsistent with the example of Jesus Christ himself.”

Seidler said that Lutherans “will not soon forget the heavy-handed reproof of a young pastor who interceded for the little children. It is quite possible Matt Harrison is a one-term president.”

(Tim Townsend writes for The St. Louis Post-Dispatch.)

Editor's note: CT noted when Harrison received nearly double the votes of his more evangelical-focused opponent, Kieschnick, in 2010, suggesting that the election signaled desire to refocus on denominational distinctives of Lutheran identity.

Comments

Could the fact that the president is elected hurt the Lutheran church? Could it be wrong that politics instead of God's call determine who rules?

I think there is a much deeper problem in all of this than a pastor praying at a ceremony with representatives of other religions and the presidents reaction to it.

May God,the father of our Lord Jesus, grant us peace as we struggle to exemplify the prayer of Christ, "that they all be one."

The rap on Jesus (the one that got him crucified) was recorded in scripture, "This man eats with sinners." It is almost beyond belief that any Christian official would condemn another Christian for offering prayer and words of condolence to grieving mothers and fathers of innocent little children who have been senselessly murdered by a crazed gunman. You wouldn't expect the president of (LCMS) to show up at the door of the biblical mothers whose children were slaughtered by King Herod. After all, there just might be one of those other neighbors standing in line who is (gasp!) not a member of the LCMS church.

It is just such actions of exclusion and control that is contributing to the obvious demise of most Christian denominations. Deliver me from such, O, Lord!

Jesus ate with sinners. He didn't pray to their false gods, or tell them that it was okay to pray to false gods, or nod benevolently while they prayed to false gods, as anyone who participates in an inter-faith prayer service is essentially asked to do. There are ways to comfort people beyond government-led prayer services, many if not most of which are far more effective and much less problematic than letting what is supposed to be a secular authority act as the collective high priest of a national "religion."

Well, if the constitution of the denomination says members aren't supposed to engage in prayer with other denominations, than they aren't supposed to engage in prayer with other denominations. Otherwise go to another denomination. The problem now-a-days is all the complainers of Christianity don't want any constitution even that of the U.S. to be followed any more. All they want is for the gov't to determine what a church teaches, believes in and asks of it's members. This pastor had to have been told this requirement when he took his vows and knew better especially when another pastor previously got reprimanded for doing the same thing. Morris is wrong. Every community has it's hurt sooner or later and the community itself has to work it out. The media and the gov't isn't there for the long haul only for the immediate what they can get out of the situation. This was not a major flood or tornado that destroyed homes etc. where the gov't has to help. It was an attack on people and that's where the church and its members are the best at helping. If this Lutheran church can help in other ways within its constitution, it can do so and that act won't split the church which is what all the complainers really want. Leave the business of the church to the church, the members will settle it not the outsiders and especially the officials of the gov't and media who have no business interfering with the church's laws and beliefs.

As an LCMS member the quandary of whether to follow Christ or to follow the denominations constitution is a no brainer. Did not Christ testify about living water to the Samaritan woman at the well? Didn't he heal the Samaritan leper who was the only one of ten who thanked him? Following his example, we should not deny comfort and healing to a hurting world.

The real problem is this: Where we are unsure, where there is gray, where we might get it wrong in our actions, we are scripturally required to 1) Place the best construction on everything and 2) Deal with one another in Christian Love and Charity. I don’t see that coming from the critics.
How many critics took the gut-wrenching time to agonize over the devastation of this Pastor and his community? The synod of Jesus day had little tolerance for Him as He in their interpretation of scripture violated the doctrines of their constitution. His responses are recorded.
The bottom line is that the Synod has no power and should not be invested with any. If the congregation that this pastor serves has no problem with it, and they are the entity invested with control, then the round-collars should just stand-down!
I did not go to the seminary to be schooled in the fine art of deciding what Syncretism and Unionism are, I went to preach the Gospel of Jesus. I trust the Word of God to pierce the hearts of Christians and non-Christians when I do so. This Pastor did just that, without any restrictions on his speech…who knows what fruit it will bear.

Post a comment:

Verification (needed to reduce spam):