What Is Gleanings?

At Christianity Today, we’re constantly tracking important developments in the church and the world. Often we use our network of reporters around the world (and for that, visit our main site). But we also monitor other news outlets, bloggers, newsmakers’ social media feeds, and countless other information streams. Gleanings compiles the most urgent and interesting items we’ve found, explains why you need to know about them, and gives you the background you need to understand them. It’s our snapshot of what God is doing in the world, hour by hour.

Free Newsletters

« Rubio's State of the Union Response Heavy on Religion | Main | Newtown 'Debacle' Revives Identity Debate as LCMS Elections Loom »

February 14, 2013

Should Sex Between Church Employees and Teens Be Classified as Rape?

(Updated) Oklahoma senate approves measure as rape investigation at Victory Christian Center continues.

Update (Mar. 25): John and Charica Daugherty, pastors at Victory Christian Center in Tulsa, have entered no-contest pleas on charges of failing to report child abuse. The pastors previously had plead not guilty.

Now, the Daughertys have been handed a five-year deferred sentence, which is not a conviction.
-----

In the wake of a child sexual abuse scandal at a Tulsa megachurch, Oklahoma lawmakers have cleared the first hurdle to classify sexual relationships between church employees and parishioners between the ages of 16 and 18 as rape—even if the relationships are consensual.

Senate Bill 175 would amend Oklahoma's definition of rape to include:

where the victim is at least sixteen (16) years of age and is less than eighteen (18) years of age and engages in sexual intercourse at any time during the victim's participation in a church youth program or membership in a church or place of worship with a person who is eighteen (18) years of age or older and is an employee or volunteer employee of the same church or ministry, despite whether the conduct occurs at a place other than the youth program locations or church or place of worship.

"The child advocacy community has identified churches and places of worship as areas where predators tend to seek employment to gain easy access to adolescents," said the bill's sponsor, Republican senator A. J. Griffin, according to Tulsa's News on 6. "It's also an area where parents tend to be a little more trusting."

The Senate Judiciary Committee changed the language to clarify that it does not matter whether or not the encounters occur on church property, as long as one person was "acting as an employee or volunteer in position of authority at the time," according to Griffin.

Following that clarification, the committee voted 8-0 to approve the bill.

The bill arises just as two Tulsa megachurch pastors elected to face a jury on charges of failing to report child abuse. John and Charica Daugherty, pastors at Victory Christian Center and the son and daughter-in-law of its head pastor, are accused of failing to report for two weeks the rape of a young girl at the church.

Three other VCC employees also faced the same charge, but waived the jury trial and elected to take a plea deal. Chris Denman, who worked as a janitor at VCC, was sentenced to 55 years in prison after pleading guilty last October to six felony sex crimes against children, including the rape.

CT previously reported on the VCC case in November 2012, when an Oklahoma county judge denied a motion to dismiss charges against the Daughertys.

Comments

I am all for defining sexual relationship between adults and teens as rape (probably would prefer an age spread defined by the law so as 19 year old and a 18 year old having consentual sex with one being a church volunteer would not be defined as rape.)

But it seems by this post that churches are being specficially targeted by this law. Is this something that is already law in OK for schools or after school programs or other places where teens are? Or is this a law that only applies to churches and not other types of program organizations?

I just read the rule on the link above and it is adding language to include churches immediately below the area that includes schools.

It would not apply to non-sectarian youth programs (boy scouts, youth sports leagues, etc). But this does seem to be more of a cause of expanding the law to include churches instead of particularly targeting churches for addtional legal supervision.

"Should Sex Between Church Employees and Teens Be Classified as Rape?"

I can't even believe this is even a question. 1. That is already statutory rape in many jurisdictions no matter where it happens. 2. Why on God's green earth would a church be different? If anything, it should be the *last* place such activity should happen, and the first to be willing to go as far as possible to protect young kids and teens from predators. 3. Have Protestants and Evangelicals learned nothing whatsoever from the sex abuse scandals of the Catholic Church? Transparency, accountability, integrity, and a refusal to cover up or delay justice for the victims is mandatory. Anything less is a refusal to "love mercy, do justice, and walk humbly with your God."

Is this a serious piece of journalism from CT? How very sad that this was even printed.
You question a secular government for protecting teens from sexual abuse by their pastoral advisors, when you should be appalled by their actions. Thank God the State was able to distinguish right from wrong, when Christian ministers and CT are unable to do so.

Law should apply to anyone, not just church members.

Are they exempting public school personnel?

Post a comment:

Verification (needed to reduce spam):