« System Update: Previous Posts | Main | Any Movement on Abortion? »

August 27, 2008

Minnery disappointed by religious outreach, not thrilled with McCain

Tom Minnery, a senior vice president with Focus on the Family, is attending many of the religious outreach events at the Democratic National Convention this week. He spoke with me about the Democrat’s religious outreach and the challenges Sen. John McCain has to overcome with evangelical voters.

What do you think so far?
I was entirely disappointed in their supposed outreach to conservative evangelical believers. It was a fraud. There was a panel, a faith forum, how can progressives work with conservative, religious people. Not a single conservative among then nine speakers and it was tired old leftist dogma. There was absolutely no discussion about responsible fatherhood. There was not a single solution proposed that didn’t involve the government.

What did you think about the interfaith service?
It’s interfaith as long as it’s on the left. I didn’t see a prominent conservative leader speak. Rev. [Blake] who spoke about the evil of abortion, I suspect he won’t be part of the interfaith dialogue in the future. It doesn’t exist. What a shame. I was hoping to see if there was real fruit in this dialogue in the supposed reach out to conservatives. They now have a candidate Barack Obama who is comfortable talking about religion, but his is a traditional liberal theological viewpoint and they went with the flow. Jim Wallis is an increasing disappointment. He may be evangelical theologically, but politically he’s liberal. Rick Warren said last week in that interview with the Wall Street Journal that his book is an agenda of the Democratic Party and I agree with that.

What about the Democrats’ efforts to reduce abortion?
There’s only a reason that abortions should be reduced, and that’s for the very same reason it should be eliminated. If it’s not life, what’s the problem with it?

What about John McCain? He’s struggled to talk about his own faith.
He does. I’m not sure of the extent of his saving faith if there is one. We as evangelicals would have hoped to hear a lot more. I hope those who are Christians who are around him are talking to him. He usually talks about that Vietnam soldier’s faith. It loosened his bonds, scratching a cross in the dirt, I’ve heard that about six times. He does seem to have viable Judeo-Christian worldview, which means that things of God are significant, the church needs to be vigorous and independent, he knows the difference between right and wrong, good and evil.

What objections do evangelicals raise about him as a candidate?
He’s inconsistent on the abortion issue, given his view of the stem-cell research side of it. He has caused great mischief for a lot of organizations including our own who try to do issue advertising to let people know how the politicians stand during the election. We can’t do that because of McCain-Feingold. Finally, the Supreme Court knocked that part of it out, but there’s an increasing number of regulations that we have to deal with, so we don’t appreciate that. I think that his joining the gang of 14 to take control over the Supreme Court justices was ineffective. Obviously we’d like a candidate that supports the Federal Marriage Amendment.

Barack Obama has hired people like Joshua DuBois and John McCain has Marlys Popma. Can you compare their religious outreach and whether it’ll work?
We’ve heard more from Marlys more than we’ve heard from Joshua, probably not a surprise. I think that evangelicals are sophisticated enough to know that you’re never going to get a perfect candidate, so you gotta take the best you can get. It’s been difficult for [Dr. Dobson]. The selection of a vice president will be significant.

There are rumors that he could choose a pro-choice candidate.
I don’t think he will. I hope he will not be that dumb. He’s the candidate who’s trying to appeal to moderates and independents. He needs somebody on the ticket who would appeal to conservatives. It’ll be interesting if it’s Mitt Romney. Mitt Romney seems to be a genuine convert on the marriage issue, on the abortion issue, although there are a small number of evangelicals who really despise him. Mitt Romney’s statements from his own campaign against Ted Kennedy for U.S. Senate in which each vied to be more liberal, those things still reverberate.

What about his Mormon faith?
There’s a concern, sure. I think that would dampen some enthusiasm. I think evangelical voters are sophisticated enough to know that Mitt Romney did not seem to turn the state house in Boston into a Mormon temple and he probably won’t turn his office in the White House into a Mormon temple. Republicans tend to give the next nomination to the guy who’s waiting. Secondly, McCain’s age is a factor ... although his mother’s in her 90s.

Comments

Odd how this view is so often ignored in the press. It would be interesting to know what part of the evangelical electorate this view represents.

Perhaps Minnery should get Dobson to run. Start a write in campaign. Actually get involved instead of sniping from the sidelines. But no, that would mean that they would have to justify their positions and speak about what they would do, rather than simply condemning others for what they don't do.

It's not the conservatives who will make or break this election. It's the moderates. Whoever the moderates lean towards will win.

There's no question about the fact that 'perilous times' have come. Once again, we are reminded to be praying fervently for those in authority.

I think that both Obama and McCain have in effect snubbed Dr James Dobson. Maybe they feel that he has too much in common with President George W Bush and would cost them more votes than he could bring them.
They know that Mr Bush is very unpopular because of Iraq and Afghanistan.

I find the whole American political scene these days depressing!

Someone has said, "Too bad those who 'know it all,' cannot 'do it all!' One would think, listening to these leaders, that they have all the answers. They're really pretty 'slick.'

I wonder why it is that Focus on the Family always implies that you have to be politically conservative to be Christian enough for them. If Jim Wallis is okay theologically, why is being politically liberal disqualifying, in their opinion? Focus on the Family had my respect before they became a political organization, when they were simply trying to help families find answers for their questions that were based in God's Word. I don't find mention of conservatives or liberals in my Bible.

There is a time when all you have is the lesser of two evils. Dr. Dobson is right McClain is not the man I would like to see as the Republican candidate but the party voted. McClain is 100 percent better then Obama.

While Obama is not accountable for his Pastor he sat under his ministry for 20 years and it was not until he was concerned about losing votes that he left.

Let's hope McClain wins if not we are in trouble, or should I say you are in trouble. I live in Canada.


Dale

I appreciate "Daniel's" response that if FOF is so determined in their political views then why not have a President Dobson someday or a President Minnery. He's right - they'd actually have to get involved and not just snipe from the sidelines.

If I were one of the candidates I'd snipe back "Walk a mile in my shoes Dr. Dobson...it's not as easy as it looks"

And while I respect the work that FOF and Dobson have done over the years with helping families survive in a crazy world, his soapbox and his head have gotten WAY too big in terms of expressing his political views. He doesn't represent all Christans in this country in terms of politcal views so I wish we could straighten out the media on that.

Not exactly a lot of courtesy and respect for the outreach efforts. After all, would anyone have blamed the DNC for telling Focus to stay away since they actually prayed for rain???

It might have been a statement if Minnery moved away from the RNC talking points long enough to acknowledge that more grace was shown to him than he has shown.

I couldn't agree more with Diane. The fact that FOTF is so concerned with Christians being politically conservative, just demonstrates their incredible bias. While it is true that certain "liberal" positions don't sit well with the Christian faith, I completely fail to see why the Democratic party proposing government-based solutions to certain problems makes their outreach to conservative Christians a "fraud." While it's hard for a Christian to support something like abortion, Christians are entitled to disagree about the best methods for dealing with issues such as poverty, health care, war, etc. Like Diane suggests, their approach towards those like Wallis makes little to no sense. He admits here that Wallis is a true evangelical conservative. So why are his liberal positions on fiscal and foreign policy issues such a concern to an organization that should be focusing on the family rather than politics?