« Tony Dungy to Join Faith-Based Council | Main | April Fool's Day (in Religion & Politics) »

April 1, 2009

NAE President Wades Carefully into Immigration Debate

The president of the National Association of Evangelicals took a rare step into the immigration debate Tuesday, saying that the long waiting period for citizenship must be

"There are inconsistencies and many outdated aspects of immigration laws, and I think they are therefore unjust and unfair," said Leith Anderson, president of the National Association of Evangelicals.

The NAE consists of 79 different member denominations, which is one of the reasons Anderson said he is hesitant to make strong statements on immigration. The NAE is drafting a resolution on this issue, and Anderson said the first draft found support at a board meeting in March.

"There was a very positive response that this was an important issue, and I think that makes sense because so many of our evangelical denominations have significant growth through the Hispanic community, and the Hispanic community is increasingly a major part of the evangelical movement through the United States so of course we care about that," Anderson said.

Anderson, a megachurch pastor in Eden Prairie, Minn., acknowledged the economic challenges facing lawmakers, but said government leaders can begin with the most obvious issues -- one of them being the long waiting period to gain citizenship.

"Immigration policy in the United States has changed a lot of times throughout our history, and it is time for immigration policy to change again," Anderson said, "and in terms of what that means, it means fairness, it means family, and it means finances."

Don Golden, senior vice president of the NAE's Baltimore-based humanitarian arm, World Relief, said his agency has seen the consequences of a broken immigration system. Although he supports border security, Golden also said he supports further legal means of attaining citizenship, including an expedited family reunification policy.

"Earned legalization will allow our immigrant brothers and sisters to come out of the shadows toward restoration and full integration, lessening the fear many immigrants feel in communities across the nation," Golden said.


I have no problem with a reasonable, well-considered LEGAL immigration policy. I just doubt that any policy that doesn't demand acceptance and enforcement will do anything but encourage more illegal border crossings. We must control and manage our immigration if we don't wish to lose all control of where things go. Personally, I tutor refugees, including illegals who are minors, who come without families. I care deeply for them, but we as a nation still need to be the ones who determine who comes and stays, not those who simply choose to ignore our laws.

I also think it is naive to assume there is no underlying agenda with our "broken" immigration system. Given what I see of how these kids are "taught" in our public schools, legal refugees included, the plan is to have a minimally educated workforce, not fully functional citizen with access to all that a complete education might provide.