« Obama Donates .3 Percent of 2008 Income To Faith-Based Charities | Main | Justice Clarence Thomas: 'There are some cases that will drive you to your knees' »

April 20, 2009

Some Pro-Lifers Like New NIH Guidelines on Embryos

Some anti-abortion religious leaders are welcoming new draft guidelines from the National Institutes of Health on embryonic stem cell research as a balanced approach to the controversial procedure.

The guidelines, issued April 17, permit federally funded research on stem cells derived from embryos that are no longer needed for fertility treatments.

Most embryos that are not planned to be used in fertility treatments are discarded or kept in a type of frozen limbo. The draft guidelines presumably would not allow federal funds to be used to create embryos solely for research purposes.

"They have hit the right balance by limiting funding to particular slated-to-be-destroyed IVF cells, yet expanding significantly the number of diseases that can be addressed by increasing the number and range of stem cell lines from which we can learn," said Joel Hunter, pastor of an Orlando-area megachurch. "These guidelines respect life from beginning to end."

The Rev. Samuel Rodriguez, president of the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference, said "the new regulations embody caution and care that respect pro-life values."

The Catholic Church opposes embryonic stem cell research, but Stephen Schneck, director of The Catholic University's Life Cycle Institute, called the draft rules "a major step toward the common ground most Americans are now demanding."

Former Southern Baptist Convention President Frank Page, in a Friday statement, said the decision is not the one conservative Christians wanted most -- a total ban on stem cell research -- but is better than it could have been.

"While Dr. Page would wish for a ban on all embryonic stem cell research that results from the destruction of any human embryos (which he refers to as unborn babies), he is somewhat heartened by the fact that the White House has issued forth regulations which prohibit any stem cell research which would come from embryos created for research," the statement reads.

Family Research Council President Tony Perkins continued his criticism of the funding of any research of embryonic stem cells.

"The research that President Obama supports is not sound science and will destroy human life," Perkins said Friday. "...(T)he guidelines implement a plan that will force taxpayers to foot the bill for research that involves human embryo destruction."

The draft guidelines followed a March 9 executive order by President Obama to rescind the Bush administration's 2001 limits on federally funded stem cell research. The NIH expects to issue final guidelines by July after a period of public comment.


I wonder if those religious leaders were just resigned to the present politics and not what they believe God would approve of? I appreciate Tony Perkins continuing to hold his convictions despite the politically incorrect view that life begins at conception and it is Gods choice from there, not man's. I find it interesting how many who hold the idea that defenseless life as "embryos" can be experimented on or destroyed, but are adamantly against things like the death penalty for convicted violent killers. Life is either life at conception or it is not... which is it? Those who believe in evolution as a theory of life's beginning could have snuffed out that first omeoba or first cell of life, which according to evolutionary theory at present started out as just some amino acids and proteins in some muck. An embryo is more advanced than this, yet evolutionary supporters often are in the camp that say it is not. They do this because that doesn't fit for them and their agenda.