<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed version="0.3" xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xml:lang="en">
	<title>Christianity Today Politics</title>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/" />
	<modified>2010-02-04T17:18:38Z</modified>
	<tagline></tagline>
	<id>tag:blog.christianitytoday.com,2010:/ctpolitics//29</id>
	<generator url="http://www.movabletype.org/" version="3.31">Movable Type</generator>
	<copyright>Copyright (c) 2010, Sarah Pulliam Bailey</copyright>
			<entry>
			<title>Hillary Clinton, Tim Tebow, Barack Obama Headline National Prayer Breakfast</title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/2010/02/hillary_clinton_1.html" />
			<modified>2010-02-04T17:18:38Z</modified>
			<issued>2010-02-04T17:07:50Z</issued>
			<id>tag:blog.christianitytoday.com,2010:/ctpolitics//29.538982563</id>
			<created>2010-02-04T17:07:50Z</created>
			<summary type="text/plain"></summary>
			<author>
				<name>Sarah Pulliam Bailey</name>
				
				<email>spulliam@christianitytoday.com</email>
			</author>
			<dc:subject>Barack Obama</dc:subject>
			<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/">
				<![CDATA[<p>Secretary of State Hillary Clinton criticized the <a href="http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2009/decemberweb-only/151-41.0.html">anti-homosexuality bill</a> proposed in Uganda while President Obama called it "odious" at the National Prayer Breakfast this morning. <a href="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctliveblog/archives/2010/01/cbs_defends_tim.html">Tim Tebow</a> gave the closing prayer. I tweeted a few updates at <a href="http://twitter.com/CTmagazine">twitter.com/ctmagazine</a> and posted video from my phone of <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SxSLV-UFsQE">Obama</a> and <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qr0xe8aOh0E">Tebow</a> on YouTube. </p>

<p>I spoke briefly with Tebow after the breakfast who was friendly but was whisked away for a meeting. I also passed South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford in the hallway but could not interview him in time before the breakfast. </p>

<p>Below I've posted Obama's remarks as released by the White House.</p>]]>
									<![CDATA[
						<p class="extended"><a href="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/2010/02/hillary_clinton_1.html">Continue reading ...</a></p>
					]]>
				   
 			</content>
		</entry>
			<entry>
			<title>Obama Pledges End to &apos;Don&apos;t Ask, Don&apos;t Tell&apos;</title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/2010/01/obama_pledges_e.html" />
			<modified>2010-01-28T21:19:22Z</modified>
			<issued>2010-01-28T02:29:49Z</issued>
			<id>tag:blog.christianitytoday.com,2010:/ctpolitics//29.538982520</id>
			<created>2010-01-28T02:29:49Z</created>
			<summary type="text/plain"></summary>
			<author>
				<name>Sarah Pulliam Bailey</name>
				
				<email>spulliam@christianitytoday.com</email>
			</author>
			<dc:subject>Barack Obama</dc:subject>
			<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/">
				<![CDATA[<p>President Obama focused on the economy in his first State of the Union address tonight, but towards the end of his speech, he briefly touched on a law that prevents openly gays from serve in the military. </p>

<p>"This year, I will work with Congress and our military to finally repeal the law that denies gay Americans the right to serve the country they love because of who they are," Obama said to shouts and applause. "It's the right thing to do." He also praised the <a href="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/2009/10/senate_passes_h.html">hate crimes law</a> passed last year.</p>

<p>Obama made a <a href="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/2009/10/gay_rights_acti.html">similar pledge</a> while speaking to the nation's largest gay advocacy group in October.</p>

<p>In 1993, President Clinton signed the the law, that says if openly gay military personnel will be discharged.</p>

<p><em>The Hill</em> <a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/77941-levin-asked-to-hold-off-on-dont-ask-dont-tell-hearing">reported</a> on Monday that the White House asked Sen. Carl Levin to postpone announcing a hearing that would explore repealing the law. The hearing had been expected at the end of January, and now the target date is expected to be February 11, Roxana Tiron reports.</p>

<p>Williams Institute at the UCLA School of Law estimates in a recent report that 66,000 gay, lesbian, and bisexuals (about 2 percent) are serving in the military, according to the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/26/AR2010012603889.html"><em>Washington Post</em></a>. </p>

<blockquote>

<p>Although President Obama's top domestic policy aides insist that the president is committed to an equality agenda for gays and lesbians, many liberal and gay rights groups are unhappy that the administration has failed to act on Obama's campaign pledge to end "don't ask, don't tell."</p>

<p>White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said Tuesday that the issue has been "a point of discussion" among top White House aides.</p>

</blockquote>

<p>Towards the end of the speech, Obama also mentioned his cooperation with Muslims. "We are working with Muslim communities around the world to promote science, education and innovation," he said.</p>

<p>Update: Virginia Governor <a href="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/2009/11/_republican_bob.html">Bob McDonnell</a> gave the Republican rebuttal, citing Scripture. </p>

<blockquote>

<p>Top-down one-size fits all decision making should not replace the personal choices of free people in a free market, nor undermine the proper role of state and local governments in our system of federalism. As our Founders clearly stated, and we Governors understand, government closest to the people governs best.</p>

<p>And no government program can replace the actions of caring Americans freely choosing to help one another. The Scriptures say "To whom much is given, much will be required." As the most generous and prosperous nation on Earth, it is heartwarming to see Americans giving much time and money to the people of Haiti. Thank you for your ongoing compassion.</p>

</blockquote>]]>
				   
 			</content>
		</entry>
			<entry>
			<title>Groups React to Supreme Court Decision on Campaign Finance</title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/2010/01/groups_react_to.html" />
			<modified>2010-01-22T20:28:18Z</modified>
			<issued>2010-01-22T20:13:36Z</issued>
			<id>tag:blog.christianitytoday.com,2010:/ctpolitics//29.538982491</id>
			<created>2010-01-22T20:13:36Z</created>
			<summary type="text/plain"><![CDATA[<p>A key issue: Whether personhood applies to corporations.</p>]]></summary>
			<author>
				<name>by Ted Olsen</name>
				
				<email>tolsen@christianitytoday.com</email>
			</author>
			<dc:subject>Supreme Court</dc:subject>
			<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/">
				<![CDATA[<p>Focus on the Family Action, Family Research Council, and Concerned Women for America praised yesterday's <a href="http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/09pdf/08-205.pdf">Supreme Court decision</a> allowing corporations to spend money on political advertising. Sojourners, meanwhile, condemned it.</p>

<p>"The censorship we now confront is vast in its reach," Justice Anthony Kennedy said in the majority opinion. "When government seeks to use its full power, including the criminal law, to command where a person may get his or her information or what distrusted source he or she may not hear, it uses censorship to control thought. This is unlawful. The First Amendment confirms the freedom to think for ourselves."</p>

<p>In his dissent, Justice John Paul Stevens warned that "the court's ruling threatens to undermine the integrity of elected institutions around the nation."</p>

<p>"The distinction between corporate and human speakers is significant," Stevens said, especially when talking about elections. "Although they make enormous contributions to our society, corporations are not actually members of it. They cannot vote or run for office. Because they may be managed and controlled by nonresidents, their interests may conflict in fundamental respects with the interests of eligible voters. … Corporations have no consciences, no beliefs, no feelings, no thoughts, no desires. Corporations help structure and facilitate the activities of human beings, to be sure, and their ‘personhood' often serves as a useful legal fiction. But they are not themselves members of ‘We the People' by whom and for whom our Constitution was established."</p>

<p>"This is sophistry," Kennedy responded in the majority opinion. "The authorized spokesman of a corporation is a human being, who speaks on behalf of the human beings who have formed that association—just as the spokesman of an unincorporated association speaks on behalf of its members. The power to publish thoughts, no less than the power to speak thoughts, belongs only to human beings, but the dissent sees no problem with a corporation's enjoying the freedom of the press."</p>

<p>Christian political organizations, some of which have recently been arguing against <a href="http://www.frcblog.com/2010/01/shall-we-save-the-whales/">extending definitions of personhood</a> to include some marine life, side with Kennedy in seeing corporations as people with speech rights.</p>

<p>"This is a win for free political speech and the right of corporate citizens to join the political process," said Family Research Council president <a href="http://www.frcblog.com/2010/01/shall-we-save-the-whales/">Tony Perkins</a>. "Had the court not acted as it did today, the United States would have continued down the road of ever increasing restrictions and impediments to the expression of political speech."</p>

<p>Concerned Women for America CEO <a href="http://www.cwfa.org/articledisplay.asp?id=18318&amp;department=MEDIA&amp;categoryid=freedom">Penny Young Nance</a> agreed. "The government should not be limiting political speech because someone is rich or poor, or because they disagree with a particular point of view.</p>

<p>Indeed, as <a href="http://www.citizenlink.org/CLtopstories/A000011906.cfm">Focus on the Family Action spokesman Tim Goeglein</a> indicated, groups like his speak frequently as institutional voices that may be stronger than any single personality. "Organizations like Focus on the Family Action, the family policy councils, all of our allies— this [Supreme Court decision] will give us an incredible voice in the great issues of our time."</p>

<p>Actually, said <a href="http://blog.sojo.net/2010/01/22/campaign-finance-outrage-democracy-for-the-highest-bidder/">Sojourners founder Jim Wallis</a>, the ruling "will give a huge boost to the special interests that already exercise a stranglehold on our political system, allowing them to tighten their grip and further prevent any meaningful change. … At a time when financial reform is at the forefront of people's concerns, giving big banks and corporations a green light to even further influence our political process is an outrage and an assault to democracy."</p>

<p>At First Things, <a href="http://www.firstthings.com/onthesquare/2010/01/the-sovereign-is-found-in-the-man">Hadley Arkes</a> is one of the few to discuss the corporate personhood issue:</p>

<blockquote>

<p>It is curious that the dissenters do not appreciate this axiomatic point: that a corporation is simply another form of an association of "human persons." The question was raised in the first case eliciting a set of opinions from the Court (<em>Chisholm v. Georgia,</em> 1793) … On what ground could a state be obliged to honor its promises and contracts? On the same ground that a person can be obliged to honor his promise, for he has made people vulnerable to the prospect that the promise will be kept. But if that holds true for the ordinary human person, why would it not hold true for an organization that is simply an association of human persons? It made the most profound difference that one understood "the State," in America, as an association of free persons, who have a claim to be ruled only with their consent.</p>

</blockquote>]]>
				   
 			</content>
		</entry>
			<entry>
			<title>GOP Takes Ted Kennedy&apos;s Senate Seat</title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/2010/01/gop_takes_ted_k.html" />
			<modified>2010-01-20T03:43:55Z</modified>
			<issued>2010-01-20T03:16:08Z</issued>
			<id>tag:blog.christianitytoday.com,2010:/ctpolitics//29.538982466</id>
			<created>2010-01-20T03:16:08Z</created>
			<summary type="text/plain"></summary>
			<author>
				<name>Sarah Pulliam Bailey</name>
				
				<email>spulliam@christianitytoday.com</email>
			</author>
			<dc:subject>U.S. Senate</dc:subject>
			<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/">
				<![CDATA[<div style="float: right; padding-left: 10px;"><a href="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/upload/2010/01/scottbrown.jpg"><img src="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/upload/2010/01/scottbrown-thumb.jpg" width="197" height="250" alt="scottbrown.jpg"/></a></div>

<p>The Republican candidate in Massachusetts has taken Ted Kennedy's Senate seat in an surprise victory today. With 97 percent of precincts <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/local/breaking_news/2010/01/polls_open_in_s_1.html">reporting</a>, Republican Scott Brown had 52 percent of the vote to Martha Coakley’s 47 percent.</p>

<p>Brown's victory strips the Democrats' 60-seat Senate supermajority needed to overcome Republican filibusters. Senate Democrats used all 60 votes in their caucus to pass the health care bill, and Democratic leadership was scrambling today to save health care reform, <a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/76957-dem-leaders-scramble-to-save-healthcare">The Hill</a> <a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/76957-dem-leaders-scramble-to-save-healthcare">reports</a>.</p>

<blockquote>

<p>Democratic aides say that senior White House officials would prefer the House pass the Senate healthcare bill without changes, which would obviate the need for a second Senate vote on the legislation.<br />
 <br />
The problem is that many liberal lawmakers in the House don’t like the Senate bill.<br />
 <br />
To compensate for this opposition, there is a proposal that the House would then pass a second measure making changes to the Senate bill. That measure could then pass through the upper chamber at a later date under special budgetary rules known as reconciliation, which allow legislation to pass with a simple majority.</p>

</blockquote>

<p>Although Brown is pro-choice, <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/politics/2008/articles/2010/01/13/abortion_takes_stage_in_senate_race/">abortion became</a> a point of attack between the two candidates. Brown is a member of the Christian Reformed Church of America, <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2009/11/20/being_the_underdog_never_deters_a_driven_brown/?page=full"><em>The Boston Globe</em></a> reported in a story in November.</p>

<blockquote>

<p>The family worships at New England Chapel in Franklin, a member of the Christian Reformed Church of America, a Protestant denomination, but has developed a special relationship with an order of Cistercian Catholic nuns at Mt. St. Mary’s Abbey in Wrentham.</p>

<p>Many of the 48 nuns are from other countries, and Brown’s first contact was in response to their request for help on an immigration matter.</p>

<p>“It has turned into a beautiful friendship,’’ said Sister Katie McNamara, the monastery’s nurse.</p>

<p>Brown raised money to buy a special golf cart to transport elderly sisters, and, with his wife, has assisted efforts to raise $5.5 million needed to replace the order’s 50-year-old candy factory with an environmentally friendly plant, complete with solar panels and a wind turbine. The order is self-sustaining through sale of its candies and fudges.</p>

</blockquote>]]>
				   
 			</content>
		</entry>
			<entry>
			<title>Obama Tells Church Faith `Keeps Me Calm&apos;</title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/2010/01/obama_tells_chu.html" />
			<modified>2010-01-18T15:43:27Z</modified>
			<issued>2010-01-18T15:36:14Z</issued>
			<id>tag:blog.christianitytoday.com,2010:/ctpolitics//29.538982445</id>
			<created>2010-01-18T15:36:14Z</created>
			<summary type="text/plain"><![CDATA[<p>President Obama visited Vermont Avenue Baptist Church, a historic congregation that was visited by Martin Luther King Jr.</p>]]></summary>
			<author>
				<name>Adelle M. Banks, Religion News Service</name>
				
				<email>spulliam@christianitytoday.com</email>
			</author>
			<dc:subject>Barack Obama</dc:subject>
			<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/">
				<![CDATA[<p>President Obama addressed how his faith guides him and the importance of hard work as he marked the birthday of the late Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. at a Washington church on Sunday.</p>

<p>   "Folks ask me sometimes why I look so calm," he said at Vermont Avenue Baptist Church, a historic congregation that was visited by King. "I have a confession to make here. ... There are times when it feels like all these efforts are for naught, and change is so painfully slow in coming, and I have to confront my own doubts. But let me tell you during those times, it's faith that keeps me calm. It's faith that gives me peace."</p>

<p>   The president spoke for almost half an hour in the usual spot for the sermon on the church's program, addressing about 500 people gathered in the Family Life Center of the congregation founded by freed slaves in 1866. At times he spoke like a preacher, opening his speech with "Good morning. Praise be to God," and concluding with "through God all things are possible."</p>

<p>   He spoke of holding the kind of "faith that breaks the silence of an earthquake's wake with the sound of prayer and hymns sung by the Haitian community," as the congregation applauded in agreement.</p>

<p>   King visited the church in 1956, Obama noted, "as a 27-year-old preacher to speak on what he called the challenge of a new age."</p>

<p>   At the time of King's visit the Supreme Court had ruled that the desegregated bus system in Montgomery, Ala., he opposed was unconstitutional. The high court had also ruled in Brown v. Board of Education against school segregation but schools and states had "ignored it with impunity," Obama recalled.</p>

<p>   "Here we are more than half a century later, once again facing the challenges of a new age," he said. Even with "fits and starts," he said there has been progress over bigotry and prejudice.</p>

<p>   "It's that progress that made it possible for me to be here today, for the good people of this country to elect an African-American the 44th president of the United States of America."</p>

<p>   He said the civil rights movement in particular and the country in general have been successful when all Americans are responsible and work hard.</p>

<p>   "In this country, there's no substitute for hard work," Obama said. "No substitute for a job well done, no substitute for being responsible stewards of God's blessings."</p>]]>
									<![CDATA[
						<p class="extended"><a href="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/2010/01/obama_tells_chu.html">Continue reading ...</a></p>
					]]>
				   
 			</content>
		</entry>
			<entry>
			<title>GOP Candidate Takes Lead in New Mass. Senate Race Poll</title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/2010/01/mass_senate_rac.html" />
			<modified>2010-01-15T21:03:23Z</modified>
			<issued>2010-01-15T15:23:06Z</issued>
			<id>tag:blog.christianitytoday.com,2010:/ctpolitics//29.538982428</id>
			<created>2010-01-15T15:23:06Z</created>
			<summary type="text/plain"></summary>
			<author>
				<name>Sarah Pulliam Bailey</name>
				
				<email>spulliam@christianitytoday.com</email>
			</author>
			<dc:subject>U.S. Senate</dc:subject>
			<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/">
				<![CDATA[<p>Republican state Senator Scott Brown is leading Democratic state Attorney General Martha Coakley by 50 percent to 46 percent, according to a <a href="http://www.bostonherald.com/news/politics/view.bg?articleid=1225720">Suffolk University/7News poll</a>. Massachusetts voters will vote on Tuesday to fill the Senate seat made vacant by Senator Ted Kennedy's death. If Brown wins, he could impact health care legislation by preventing Senate Democrats from breaking a filibuster. </p>

<p>The conscience clause, where health care workers workers can opt out of offering services like contraception if the workers are morally against it, has become a contentious issue in the campaign.</p>

<p>In a recent interview, Coakley suggested to radio host Ken Pittman that Catholics should not work in emergency rooms.</p>

<div class='snap_preview'><p><span style='text-align:center; display: block;'><object width='410' height='332'><param name='movie' value='http://www.youtube.com/v/CJ-ZeLSZPc8&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;hd=0' /> <param name='allowfullscreen' value='true' /> <param name='wmode' value='transparent' /> <embed src='http://www.youtube.com/v/CJ-ZeLSZPc8&#038;rel=1&#038;fs=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;hd=0' type='application/x-shockwave-flash' allowfullscreen='true' width='410 height='332' wmode='transparent'></embed> </object></span></p>

<blockquote>

<p>    Pittman: Right, if you are a Catholic, and believe what the Pope teaches that any form of birth control is a sin. ah you don’t want to do that.</p>

<p>    Coakley: No we have a seperation of church and state Ken, lets be clear.</p>

<p>    Pittman: In the emergency room you still have your religious freedom.</p>

<p>    Coakley: (pause) The law says that people are allowed to have that. You can have religious freedom but you probably shouldn’t work in the emergency room.</p>

</blockquote>
]]>
									<![CDATA[
						<p class="extended"><a href="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/2010/01/mass_senate_rac.html">Continue reading ...</a></p>
					]]>
				   
 			</content>
		</entry>
			<entry>
			<title>Court Mulls California&apos;s Proposition 8</title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/2010/01/court_mulls_cal.html" />
			<modified>2010-01-13T14:16:58Z</modified>
			<issued>2010-01-13T06:31:18Z</issued>
			<id>tag:blog.christianitytoday.com,2010:/ctpolitics//29.538982380</id>
			<created>2010-01-13T06:31:18Z</created>
			<summary type="text/plain"></summary>
			<author>
				<name>Sarah Pulliam Bailey</name>
				
				<email>spulliam@christianitytoday.com</email>
			</author>
			<dc:subject>Same-sex Marriage</dc:subject>
			<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/">
				<![CDATA[<p>A federal court turned to historians Tuesday as it considers the constitutionality of Proposition 8, an amendment that banned same-sex marriage in California. </p>

<p>Harvard professor Nancy Cott told a federal court in San Francisco that child rearing was only one of several purposes of marriage, not "the central or defining purpose," the <em><a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-prop8-trial13-2010jan13,0,1776382.story">Los Angeles Times</a></em> reports.</p>

<blockquote>

<p>She noted that that divorce rates rose steeply in the 1960s and marriage continued to be viewed negatively in the 1970s as heterosexuals advocated "open marriages" and "swinging." But divorce rates hit a plateau in the 1980s, and marriage is now held in high esteem in the U.S., she said.</p>

<p>She attributed the higher status of marriage to advocacy by the Christian right and the growing clamoring of gays and lesbians to participate in it.</p>

<p>During cross-examination, lawyers for the Proposition 8 campaign noted that racial restrictions on marriage in the U.S. were never as "uniform" or widespread as the ban on same-sex marriage. He also asked Cott if it was possible to predict the consequences same-sex marriage would have on society.</p>

</blockquote>

<p>The Alliance Defense Fund has been posting regular <a href="http://twitter.com/adfmedia">Twitter updates</a> of the trial. </p>

<p>The U.S. Supreme Court overruled U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker Monday and blocked video coverage of the trial on YouTube, according to the <em><a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nation-and-world/la-na-prop-8-12-2010jan12,0,7701011.story">Los Angeles Times</a></em>.</p>

<blockquote>

<p>This is the second time in recent months in which the high court has intervened on behalf of the defenders of "traditional marriage" and granted an emergency appeal.</p>

<p>In October, the justices blocked officials in the state of Washington from releasing the names of 138,000 people who signed ballot petitions seeking to overturn a state law giving equal benefits to gay and lesbian couples. Under Washington law, the names were considered public record.</p>

</blockquote>

<p>Meanwhile, a group of conservative leaders gathered in Washington, D.C. yesterday for a press conference lobbying congress to uphold the Defense of Marriage Act. Leaders included Maryland pastor Harry Jackson, Family Research Council President Tony Perkins and Samuel Rodriguez, president of the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference.</p>

<p> “This right has been illegally taken from the people by the Council and it is the responsibility of Congress to restore it,” Jackson said.</p>

<p>The group also wants Congress to veto <a href="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/2009/12/dc_council_pass.html">a bill passed in December</a> that legalized same-sex marriage marriage Washington, D.C. </p>]]>
				   
 			</content>
		</entry>
			<entry>
			<title>Sarah Palin to Join Fox News</title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/2010/01/sarah_palin_to_1.html" />
			<modified>2010-01-11T20:05:21Z</modified>
			<issued>2010-01-11T18:57:09Z</issued>
			<id>tag:blog.christianitytoday.com,2010:/ctpolitics//29.538982370</id>
			<created>2010-01-11T18:57:09Z</created>
			<summary type="text/plain"></summary>
			<author>
				<name>Sarah Pulliam Bailey</name>
				
				<email>spulliam@christianitytoday.com</email>
			</author>
			<dc:subject>Sarah Palin</dc:subject>
			<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/">
				<![CDATA[<p>Former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin will contribute to Fox News, according to Jim Rutenberg of <em><a href="http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/01/11/sarah-palin-to-contribute-to-fox-news/?hp">The New York Times</a></em>.<br />
<blockquote></p>

<p>The network confirmed that Ms. Palin will appear on the network’s programming on a regular basis as part of a multi-year deal. Financial terms were not disclosed.</p>

<p>Ms. Palin will not have her own regular program, one person familiar with the deal said, though she will host an occasional series that will run on the network from time to time. This person would not elaborate, but the network does have a precedent for such a series. Oliver L. North is the host of an occasionally running documentary series on the military called “War Stories.” </p>

</blockquote>

<p>Details could be released this afternoon, Rutenberg writes.</p>]]>
				   
 			</content>
		</entry>
			<entry>
			<title>Most Read Politics Posts of 2009</title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/2009/12/most_read_polit.html" />
			<modified>2009-12-31T18:56:15Z</modified>
			<issued>2009-12-31T18:24:24Z</issued>
			<id>tag:blog.christianitytoday.com,2009:/ctpolitics//29.538982324</id>
			<created>2009-12-31T18:24:24Z</created>
			<summary type="text/plain"></summary>
			<author>
				<name>Sarah Pulliam Bailey</name>
				
				<email>spulliam@christianitytoday.com</email>
			</author>
			
			<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/">
				<![CDATA[<p>It's that time of the year where we tend to reflect on news, ideas, and events of the past 12 months. Here are the top 10 most read blog posts from 2009 (You can see 2008's most read <a href="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/2008/12/most_read_of_20.html">here</a>). Readership piqued around the inauguration, but Newt Gingrich's conversion, President Obama's church attendance and Carrie Prejean also grabbed your interest.</p>

<p>1. <a href="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/2009/03/gingrich_to_con.html">Gingrich to Convert to Catholicism</a> </p>

<p>2. <a href="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/2009/01/rick_warrens_in.html">Rick Warren's Inaugural Invocation</a></p>

<p>3. <a href="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/2009/01/gay_bishop_kick.html">Gay Bishop Kicks off Celebrity-filled Event</a></p>

<p>4. <a href="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/2009/06/obama_chooses_a.html">Has Obama Chosen a Church?</a> </p>

<p>5. <a href="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/2009/01/warren_applauds.html">Warren Affirms Obama's 'Desire to be President of Every Citizen'</a></p>

<p>6. <a href="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/2009/01/a_reference_to.html">A reference to research on embryos?</a></p>

<p>7. <a href="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/2009/05/miss_california_2.html">Miss California Says Racy Photos Posted to Mock Faith</a></p>

<p>8. <a href="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/2009/01/pic_apologizes.html">PIC Apologizes for not Broadcasting Robinson's Prayer</a></p>

<p>9. <a href="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/2009/01/obama_surprises.html">Obama Surprises Church with a Visit</a></p>

<p>10. <a href="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/2009/05/obama_addresses.html">Obama Addresses Abortion, Religion, and Race at Notre Dame</a></p>]]>
				   
 			</content>
		</entry>
			<entry>
			<title>Senate&apos;s Health Care Bill Includes Abstinence Ed. Funding</title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/2009/12/senates_health.html" />
			<modified>2009-12-28T20:15:23Z</modified>
			<issued>2009-12-28T19:17:02Z</issued>
			<id>tag:blog.christianitytoday.com,2009:/ctpolitics//29.538982314</id>
			<created>2009-12-28T19:17:02Z</created>
			<summary type="text/plain"></summary>
			<author>
				<name>Sarah Pulliam Bailey</name>
				
				<email>spulliam@christianitytoday.com</email>
			</author>
			<dc:subject>Health Care</dc:subject>
			<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/">
				<![CDATA[<p>The health-care reform bill passed in the Senate on Christmas Eve includes $50 million for states to use for abstinence education funding, the <em>Washington Post</em> <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/26/AR2009122600762.html">reports</a>. Under President Bush, abstinence programs received about $150 million per year but the federal budget signed by President Obama does not include funds directed towards them.</p>

<blockquote>The initiative includes $25 million for new, innovative programs that could potentially embrace those encouraging abstinence. But it does not earmark funding for programs focused on maintaining virginity. Some said the move was aimed at mollifying conservative critics, but [Valerie Huber of the National Abstinence Education Association] and others remained skeptical.

<p>"There is absolutely no priority given to risk avoidance," Huber said. "So there is no certainty that even one dollar would go to this approach."</p>

<p>Huber estimated that more than 130 programs around the country, serving perhaps 1.5 million youths, will lose funding by September unless at least some money is restored through the health-reform legislation.<br />
</blockquote></p>

<p>In September, Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) <a href="http://www.sltrib.com/news/ci_13449319">pushed for the inclusion</a> of an amendment in the Senate Finance Committee bill that would provide the funds for abstinence education programs.</p>

<p>"I was as surprised as anyone to see abstinence-only education programs funded in the final Reid health care bill. There must have been some Democrats who wanted to see the abstinence-only language included," Hatch said in a statement.</p>

<p>The House and Senate still must reconcile their versions of health-care legislation. According to the <em>Post</em>, the House bill includes $50 million to fund sex education programs while the Senate's version includes $75 million for additional sex education programs.<br />
</p>]]>
				   
 			</content>
		</entry>
			<entry>
			<title>What Baby Jesus Symbolizes for Obama</title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/2009/12/what_baby_jesus.html" />
			<modified>2009-12-31T00:30:04Z</modified>
			<issued>2009-12-22T14:52:38Z</issued>
			<id>tag:blog.christianitytoday.com,2009:/ctpolitics//29.538982300</id>
			<created>2009-12-22T14:52:38Z</created>
			<summary type="text/plain"></summary>
			<author>
				<name>Sarah Pulliam Bailey</name>
				
				<email>spulliam@christianitytoday.com</email>
			</author>
			<dc:subject>Barack Obama</dc:subject>
			<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/">
				<![CDATA[<p>President Obama <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hb3cuAMYEhRICW6f6IKv9sOEGpsA">visited</a> a Boys & Girls Club in Washington, D.C. yesterday to deliver some cookies and talk about the baby Jesus.</p>

<p>When Obama said it's important to remember why Christmas, one of the children piped up and said, "I know!" Obama asked, "Do you know?" The child said, "The birth of baby Jesus." Here's how Obama responded, according to a transcript provided by the White House.</p>

<blockquote>

<p>The birth of baby Jesus, and what he symbolizes for people all around the world is the possibility of peace and people treating each other with respect.  And so I just hope that spirit of giving that's so important at Christmas, I hope all of you guys remember that as well.  You know, it's not just about getting gifts but it's also doing something for other people.  So being nice to your mom and dad and grandma and aunties and showing respect to people -- that's really important too, that's part of the Christmas spirit, don't you think?  Do you agree with me?</p>

</blockquote>

<p>He asked the children if they had an interesting observation.</p>

<blockquote>

<p>Child: I know why we give gifts to other people.<br />
Obama: Why is that?<br />
Child: Because the three wise men gave gifts to baby Jesus.<br />
Obama: That's exactly right. ... You know, the three wise men, if you think about it, here are these guys, they have all this money, they've got all this wealth and power, and yet they took a long trip to a manger just to see a little baby.  And it just shows you that just because you're powerful or you're wealthy, that's not what's important.  What's important is what's -- the kind of spirit you have.<br />
So I hope everybody has a spirit of kindness and thoughtfulness, and everybody is really thinking about how can they do for other people -- treating them well, because that's really the spirit of Christmas.</p>

</blockquote>]]>
				   
 			</content>
		</entry>
			<entry>
			<title> Senate Passes Test Vote as Sen. Nelson Announces Support</title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/2009/12/senate_passes_t.html" />
			<modified>2009-12-21T17:24:13Z</modified>
			<issued>2009-12-21T16:21:16Z</issued>
			<id>tag:blog.christianitytoday.com,2009:/ctpolitics//29.538982297</id>
			<created>2009-12-21T16:21:16Z</created>
			<summary type="text/plain"><![CDATA[<p>Conservatives lash out against Nelson who had said he would filibuster the proposal because he said it funded abortions. </p>]]></summary>
			<author>
				<name>Sarah Pulliam Bailey</name>
				
				<email>spulliam@christianitytoday.com</email>
			</author>
			<dc:subject>Health Care</dc:subject>
			<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/">
				<![CDATA[<p>The Senate <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1209/30850.html">voted</a> for cloture this morning on an $871 billion bill to extend health care coverage to most Americans. </p>

<p>Senator Ben Nelson, D-Nebraska, the last holdout, said Saturday that he would support the bill after Senate Majority leader Harry Reid unveiled his final package of changes. Nelson <a href="http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2009/decemberweb-only/150-31.0.html">had said</a> he would filibuster the bill because it federally funded abortions.</p>

<p>Here's the difference between abortion funding in the House and the Senate versions of the health care proposal, according to Paul Kane of the <em><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/19/AR2009121902383.html?hpid=topnews">Washington Post</a></em>.</p>

<blockquote>

<p>Under the new abortion provisions, states can opt out of allowing plans to cover abortion in the insurance exchanges the bill would set up. The exchanges are designed to serve individuals who lack coverage through their jobs, with most receiving federal subsidies to buy insurance. Enrollees in plans that cover abortion procedures would pay with separate checks -- one for abortion, one for any other health-care services.</p>

<p>This was an effort to comport with the 32-year prohibition against federal funding for abortions, but the Nelson compromise is a softening of the House language, which was written by Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.). The Stupak amendment forbid any insurer in the exchange "to pay for any abortion or to cover any part of the costs of any health plan that includes coverage of abortion" -- a position that abortion rights advocates suggested would have led to many insurance providers dropping abortion coverage. </p>

</blockquote>

<p>The Associated Press also offers a <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gm81TTE7a0EUL9JlzVML1dnH2N2gD9CN8CKO0">summary</a> of the differences.</p>

<p>Conservative groups like Americans United for Life (AUL) and Family Research Council (FRC) sent out e-mails in opposition to Nelson's support.</p>]]>
									<![CDATA[
						<p class="extended"><a href="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/2009/12/senate_passes_t.html">Continue reading ...</a></p>
					]]>
				   
 			</content>
		</entry>
			<entry>
			<title>D.C. Council Passes Bill Allowing Same-Sex Marriage </title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/2009/12/dc_council_pass.html" />
			<modified>2009-12-29T22:15:16Z</modified>
			<issued>2009-12-15T22:16:43Z</issued>
			<id>tag:blog.christianitytoday.com,2009:/ctpolitics//29.538982273</id>
			<created>2009-12-15T22:16:43Z</created>
			<summary type="text/plain"></summary>
			<author>
				<name>Sarah Pulliam Bailey</name>
				
				<email>spulliam@christianitytoday.com</email>
			</author>
			<dc:subject>Same-sex Marriage</dc:subject>
			<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/">
				<![CDATA[<p>The Washington, D.C. City Council <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gftV6RnfBC8iPPWGM0SGQeNLiC6QD9CK0J4G0">passed</a> a measure Tuesday legalizing same-sex marriage, and opponents plan</a> to try to get it overturned in Congress or at the polls, <em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/16/us/16marriage.html">The New York Times</a></em> reports.</p>

<blockquote>

<p>“The City Council’s action today is not the final word,” said Bishop Harry Jackson, pastor of Hope Christian Church in Beltsville and chairman of a group called Stand4MarriageDC.</p>

<p>Mr. Jackson said he would lobby Congress to intervene, but he acknowledged that such a move threatened to upset some of his local supporters, who may be put off by the prospect of subverting local autonomy.</p>

<p>Mr. Jackson’s group is challenging in court on Jan. 6 the city’s Board of Elections and Ethics decision not to hold a referendum on the matter. </p>

</blockquote>

<p>Last month, Maine voters <a href="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/2009/11/maines_samesex.html">overturned</a> the state legislature's passage of a same-sex marriage law. The New York state Senate <a href="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/2009/12/new_york_state.html">recently rejected</a> a bill that would have allowed same-sex marriage while New Jersey's legislature <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/10/nyregion/10marriage.html">postponed</a> a vote on same-sex marriage after the measure seemed headed for defeat.</p>]]>
				   
 			</content>
		</entry>
			<entry>
			<title>Breaking: Senate Rejects Abortion Restrictions in Health Bill</title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/2009/12/breaking_senate.html" />
			<modified>2009-12-08T23:05:07Z</modified>
			<issued>2009-12-08T22:49:38Z</issued>
			<id>tag:blog.christianitytoday.com,2009:/ctpolitics//29.538982225</id>
			<created>2009-12-08T22:49:38Z</created>
			<summary type="text/plain"><![CDATA[<p>Majority leader Harry Reid may not have the necessary votes to move health-care reform bill to passage without key prolife Dem. </p>]]></summary>
			<author>
				<name>David Neff</name>
				
				<email>dneff@christianitytoday.com</email>
			</author>
			<dc:subject>Abortion</dc:subject>
			<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/">
				<![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/capitol-briefing/2009/12/senate_rejects_abortion_amendm.html?hpid=topnews">Washington Post</a> and <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/HealthCare/senators-defeat-abortion-amendment-health-care-bill/story?id=9279079">ABC News </a>reported just a few minutes ago that the Senate defeated Senator Ben Nelson's amendment that would have restricted abortion coverage in insurance policies purchased by people receiving federal subsidies under the Senate's proposed health-care reform bill. The amendment was defeated 54-45. </p>

<p>Nelson had threatened to filibuster the bill unless the abortion restrictions were added. Without Nelson's vote, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid may not have the necessary votes to move the bill toward passage. Reid hinted that he may try to find another way to satisfy Nelson's concerns and win his vote. </p>]]>
				   
 			</content>
		</entry>
			<entry>
			<title>Huckabee: Religion Had Nothing to Do with the Commutation</title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/2009/12/huckabee_religi.html" />
			<modified>2009-12-04T17:17:21Z</modified>
			<issued>2009-12-04T16:58:06Z</issued>
			<id>tag:blog.christianitytoday.com,2009:/ctpolitics//29.538982209</id>
			<created>2009-12-04T16:58:06Z</created>
			<summary type="text/plain"></summary>
			<author>
				<name>Sarah Pulliam Bailey</name>
				
				<email>spulliam@christianitytoday.com</email>
			</author>
			<dc:subject>Mike Huckabee</dc:subject>
			<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/">
				<![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/01/us/politics/01huckabee.html">Several</a> <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=121083867">media</a> <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091201/ap_on_re_us/us_huckabee_horton">outlets</a> <a href="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctpolitics/2009/12/huckabees_cleme.html">have connected</a> Mike Huckabee's commutation of Maurice Clemmons, who fatally shot four police officers earlier this week, to the former governor of Arkansas's background as a Southern Baptist pastor. Huckabee defended himself in a column for <a href="http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=34636&page=">Human Events</a>.</p>

<blockquote>

<p>Religion had nothing to do with the commutation.  It’s been erroneously expressed that my own personal faith or the claims of faith of the inmate factored into my decision.  That is simply not true and nothing in the record even suggests it.  The reasons were straightforward -- a unanimous recommendation from the board, support from a trial judge and no objections from officials in a case that involved a 16 year old sentenced to a term that was exponentially longer than similar cases and certainly longer than had he been white, upper middle class, and represented by effective counsel who would have clearly objected to the sentencing.</p>

</blockquote>

<p><em>Christianity Today</em> recently posted a November <a href="http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2009/decemberweb-only/148-32.0.html">interview</a> with Huckabee.</p>]]>
				   
 			</content>
		</entry>
	
</feed>