Hermenuetics

« Christians Urge Obama to Keep Conscience Clause | Main | Breast-feed, If You Can Afford To »

April 13, 2009

Why Melissa Rogers Signed the Health Care Workers Document

Sarah Pulliam

Dozens of religious leaders met in Washington with members of Obama's administration last week to go over policy issues. Right before the meetings began, the White House also announced the full Advisory Council on Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships. One of those members included Melissa Rogers, director of the Wake Forest University School of Divinity Center for Religion and Public Affairs, who joined the council to make sure partnerships between faith-based groups and the government would be constitutionally sound. I recently asked her about the council and why she signed the statement on conscience protections that Katelyn wrote about last week.

Why did you sign the statement urging the Obama administration on conscience protections for health workers? Do you think it will be effective?

First, a bit of background. There are specific conscience protections for health-care workers in federal statutory law. These statutes will continue to exist no matter the outcome of the administrative process - an administrative agency cannot undo federal statutes. The administrative process asked whether a Bush regulation dealing with these issues should be rescinded or retained.

Our statement did not ask the Obama administration to retain or rescind the Bush regulation because we could not agree on that issue. What we agree on is that if the Obama administration rescinds the Bush regulation, it should educate the stakeholders about existing federal statutory protections for the rights of conscience. We also argued that the administration should work with Congress to strengthen the religious accommodation provisions of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, provisions that are broader than the federal statutes that simply address conscience protections in the health-care arena. We believe these Title VII provisions should be amended so that they offer more robust protections for those who seek to have their religious needs respected in the workplace.

As we said in the comments, this should not be a zero-sum game. We should make every effort to honor the rights of conscience while providing access to lawful health-care services.

How is this office different from the one that President Bush established?
The Obama White House has said that ensuring that these partnerships are in compliance with the Constitution is a priority, as is making sure that they are effective and sensibly arranged for both providers and beneficiaries. It has said it won't measure success by how many religious groups or secular groups get government money, but by whether its policy goals (like bringing about an inclusive economic recovery) are being achieved through these partnerships.

The Obama office has a much broader mandate. There is an effort to see, for example, where the areas of agreement are on issues like encouraging responsible fatherhood, reducing the number of abortions, and promoting good stewardship of the environment. And the administration is involving religious and secular communities not only in discussions about social service partnerships but also about what the government's policy should be on domestic and global poverty.

Posted by Sarah Pulliam Bailey on April 13, 2009 9:19 AM

recent posts

Archives

February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009

February 2012

Sun	Mon	Tue	Wed	Thu	Fri	Sat
			1	2	3	4
5	6	7	8	9	10	11
12	13	14	15	16	17	18
19	20	21	22	23	24	25
26	27	28	29