« Where Someone Loves Us Most of All | Main | What Christian Women Want Now »
October 26, 2009Penny Pinching as a Christian Virtue?
The spiritual dimensions of frugal living.
Recently, my child who was home-schooled for six years attended a conference called Gathering Around the Un-hewn Stone. I make note of his educational history because I feel responsible for inspiring alternative ideas that catalyzed more alternatives than I imagined when he was 8.
The event opened with a lecture, "The Ecological Endgame of Industrial Civilization as a Crisis of/for Faith," which was purported to be about the moral bankruptcy of progress as an article of faith in modernity and, by default, of Christianity for the past 300 years. Resistance involves learning how to brain tan a deer, forage for food, and live out “attachment parenting” — a phenomenon about which my son has no need of instruction, given that he clung to me like a monkey when he was a boy.
In her book, In CHEAP We Trust: The Story of a Misunderstood American Virtue, journalist Lauren Weber espouses similar values, which, like rank materialism, are as old and American as Manifest Destiny. Last week Atlantic economics blogger Megan McArdle reviewed Weber’s book for The New York Times, and compared it unfavorably with the work of financial adviser Dave Ramsey, whom she describes as a “popular evangelical guru.”
Weber grew up without much heat in her home and surprised herself by following in her father’s frugal footsteps. McArdle takes issue with Weber’s idealization of fiscal asceticism, but not with Ramsey’s "save now, worry less later" approach. She says Weber’s idea of thrift as a moral virtue is problematic because it unduly worships parsimony. And McArdle rightly notes that if dumpster-diving “freegans” weren’t living off the largesse of their guilty neighbors, they’d have to get jobs like everybody else. The same could be said of Gathering Around the Un-hewn Stone attendees reveling in a buffet of supermarket overstock, but not of trash eaters around the world who have no other choice.
“We should be taxing carbon, pesticide overuse and other excesses that push the costs of our consumption onto others," writes McArdle, a fiscal conservative. "But once things are priced properly, there’s nothing particularly admirable in refusing to spend money you can spare. If you’re already financially secure and we’ve priced in the negative externalities of activities like driving and eating meat, then walking to work, lowering the thermostat and eating lower on the food chain isn’t virtuous. It’s just a lifestyle choice.”
Not so fast, Ms. McArdle.
Matthew 25 presents three metaphors for stewardship that imbue it with far more value. In the first, Jesus speaks of wise and unwise virgins who ready themselves or not for their long-awaited bridegroom. The unprepared are dis-invited to the wedding banquet, while the conscientious brides enjoy a lavish celebration. In the second, we meet faithful and unfaithful servants who are entrusted with varying degrees of wealth. The only steward to be cast into outer darkness is the fearful miser who buries his wealth and maligns the character of his lord to justify himself.
Finally, we encounter the sheep and the goats. Theirs is a parable of dire consequence. The sheep that live un-selfconsciously generous lives are welcomed into eternal glory, while the self-righteous, self-absorbed flock of goats suffers eternal punishment. Prudence, stewardship, and generosity are neither conflicting values nor simple matters of preference; they are deeply Christian virtues.
I learned hard work and generosity from my evangelical parents, and frugality from my classmates at Eastern Mennonite University. Having arrived my freshman year in a cherry-red Cadillac and a modest but lovely new wardrobe, I found myself embarrassed in the presence of my 23-year-old roommate. She had come from the mission field and from an old-order Mennonite home. That meant living out of a suitcase for a few years and growing up without a TV or a washing machine. Her mother canned her own beef and sewed quilts in her spare time to raise money for missions. Her father worked the farm. We didn’t exactly mesh, my roommate and I, but I left EMU with lifelong values about wealth and what it’s for. I taught those values to my children.
McArdle says Ramsey followers are “righteously scolded” for spending in excess of $100 a month on groceries. That’s not a life I want to live, nor is it one that necessarily reflects Christian virtue. But neither do I want a 50-inch plasma-screen TV dominating the communal living space in my home like McArdle. I’d rather see my son’s reclaimed deer bone knives and cigar box synthesizers cluttering up the place, even if it means he lives off his parents’ middle class largesse for longer than aspirational living — ascetic or otherwise — requires.




Comments
I'm a unclear on the author's thesis. Frugality for the sake of good stewardship is a biblical thing as long as it doesn't become either an idol to worship of itself and as long as it doesn't interfere with generosity? Is that what she's trying to say?
Posted By: Robyn | October 26, 2009 11:54 AM
You lost me.
Posted By: muse | October 26, 2009 2:20 PM
Ouch on the grocery bill. I'm pretty frugal. I'm even into wild edibles (in spring I love a good omelette decorated with forsythia flowers, or a nice violet-leaf and flower salad). But... um... is McArdle suggesting the dumpster as an alternative to the co-op?
(I know you're not recommending that, Christine! :)
Posted By: L.L. Barkat | October 26, 2009 3:52 PM
I agree with the first guy.. so God wants us to be cheapskates, or doesn't he?
We like to celebrate asceticism... I think it's a response to guilt we get from our dimestore theology.
Posted By: Kyle | October 26, 2009 4:01 PM
Robyn, My thesis was pretty simple. McArdle would have done better to employ a biblical theology of stewardship to make her case rather than an evangelical "guru."
Muse, If two are confused, one hasn't written well and should do better next time.
L.L., No, McArdle isn't advocating dumpster diving. Weber wrote about it in her book, but McArcle thinks Ramsey's message will resonate more with Americans than Webers.
I prefer the generous stewardship of Matthew 25 to both models, even though there are common themes among them. The Matthew 25 model represents an open hand, while the other two represent a closed fist, IMHO.
Posted By: Christine A. Scheller | October 26, 2009 4:19 PM
I agree that this is a poorly written article. It's a random stream of consciousness piece that leaves the reader with no clear idea of which side the writer is supporting or what response she is attempting to solicit from the reader.
Posted By: Pastor Karl | October 29, 2009 4:54 PM
Great topic! My thoughts are that God wants us to be good stewards and that means giving and spending should reflect our love, our committment, to him. I do not think that means being a cheapskate necessarily - and before you assume I am a wealtier hypocrite, understand I have to buy my food from the dollar store or walmart often. It stands to reason that if you are giving as God instructs us to give, that you are porbably giving until it hurts- or stretches you. I know that God honors that sort of giving as I am there, and believe me he pays attention to the acts of the heart, the faithfulness to give. Back to to the frugal living, I think unless you are able to grow some of your own food, living on 100 a month for groceries is extremely hard, food cost a lot more than when I was a kid, and even using coupons, it is almost impossible to avoid going over that budget. I am all for frugal living, but I think we have to go back to what God says, He said he will give us (the faithful) the fat of the land, that our cups will overflow with blessings. That does not sound to me like we are eating bologna & ramen every day. So, my point is that, we must look at the faith walk we want to reflect when grocery shopping, are we eating our vegetables, fruits, or are we buying alot of convenience items that tend to make us less healthy vessels, or are filled with additives, sweeteners, and empty calories. It is no different than drinking one cup of fresh water from the sink and one cup from the toilet when we take into our bodies things that make our testimony less effective to show the glory of God. Also, how we live and spend reflects that as well. I think we can live under the blessings of God, and be increased in our possesions and gifts from him, but also maintain an attitude of humility and non-attachment to the things of the world, bringing every task to him and weighing inro rhe equation whether or not it fulfills our mission, our commitment to him. Then I think we are wise, we get Matthew 25 when we actually submit all our actions to him, we are the wise virgins- because after all is not the oil their lamps, the essence of our lives? My choice is clear, God is the filler of my lamp, and if he chooses to give me extra, then he will show me what to do with it.
Posted By: Suzy | November 2, 2009 9:03 AM
Sorry...I'm in the confused camp.
Posted By: Jennifer | November 2, 2009 1:17 PM
Suzy, you said more in your last sentence than was said in the article and all the rest of the comments put together. The only thing we need to do is to learn where 'extra' begins.
Posted By: Jim | November 2, 2009 7:44 PM