What Is Her.meneutics?
The Christianity Today women's blog provides news and analysis from the perspective of evangelical women. We cover news stories and books related to international justice and evangelism, pregnancy and sexual ethics, marriage, parenting, and celibacy, pop culture, health and body image, raising girls, and women in the church and parachurch.Her.meneutics is edited by associate editor Katelyn Beaty and online editor Sarah Pulliam Bailey.
Free Newsletters
books we're reading
« Stanton Jones, CedarvilleOUT Come to Campus | Main | Iranian Christian Women Freed from Evin Prison »
November 18, 2009Silencing the Maternal Nag
I've learned that our baby needs a mother and father, not two mothers.
Christine Gardner
Women want their spouses to be more involved in raising their children, but they need to allow fathers to father, not force them to mother. The New York Times reported last week on new research that suggests that women are unintentionally blocking men from greater participation in child-raising because they insist that men do it their way. Women need to find a way to encourage their partners for the good of the children. The research shows that children thrive when both mom and dad are involved, not one or the other.
The article hit close to home. As a new mother, I confess to needing to fight the temptation to turn my husband into my employee in the Raising Our Son business. We both work outside the home, but because I’ve chosen to exclusively breast-feed, I’ve arranged my schedule so that I’m with our baby more than my husband is. Naturally, I feel like the expert on what each of our son’s cries and coos mean. Sharing information on our son’s development is helpful, but when I swoop in to rescue our fussy baby from my husband’s arms, I know I’ve gone too far. More often than not, the baby keeps fussing in my arms, anyway.
But shouldn’t my husband be quietly humming Brahms Lullaby instead of singing the raucous Rocky Raccoon song (our own creation) while he is getting our son ready for bed? Isn’t PBS better than the Golf Channel for their television viewing? Should they even be watching television? Again, I have to silence the inner nag. The point is that my husband is involved in the raising of our son. Our child needs a mother and a father, not two mothers.
That children do better when both parents are involved is not news. What caught my attention in the New York Times article is that research affirms that happy marriages make for happy children. As Philip Cowan, emeritus professor of psychology at the University of California, Berkeley, is quoted as saying, “Parents work all day, and feel as if they need to give every other minute to the kids. But if they don’t take care of the relationship between them, they’re not taking care of the whole story.” Nagging my husband to take care of our son serves only to gnaw away at our marriage.
As a child, I remember going into the kitchen looking for a snack, only to find my parents kissing by the refrigerator. I would usually giggle, or in later years, offer my pre-adolescent commentary: “That’s so gross.” I also felt a sense of warmth and security that I couldn’t name at the time. I would find the Oreos, go back to watching Happy Days or The Muppet Show, feeling that all was right in my world.
Placing love for spouse ahead of love for children is not without controversy. Ayelet Waldman, author most recently of Bad Mother: A Chronicle of Maternal Crimes, Minor Calamities, and Occasional Moments of Grace (Doubleday, 2009), created quite a stir when she confessed in a 2005 New York Times column that she loved her husband more than her children. She writes,
I wish some learned sociologist would publish a definitive study of marriages where the parents are desperately, ardently in love, where the parents love each other even more than they love the children. It would be wonderful if it could be established, once and for all, that the children of these marriages are more successful, happier, live longer, and have healthier lives than children whose mothers focus their desires and passions on them.
Of course, it’s a false dichotomy to suggest that one must love one’s spouse or children more than the other. But in our child-centric society where photos of kids-as-accessories fill the pages of celebrity tabloids, it’s good to be reminded that marriage is supposed to come before children. Even within Christian culture, our desire to “focus on the family” can take on an idolatrous zeal.
We have developed a ritual in the Gardner household called the “family sandwich”: When my husband comes through the door to the kitchen from the garage at the end of the day, we embrace, and then we kiss the baby. Since I’m usually holding our son at the time, he becomes the “meat” in our family sandwich. Now that I think of it, it usually happens by the refrigerator.
Posted by Katelyn Beaty on November 18, 2009 9:41 AM
recent posts
tags
- 9/11
- abortion
- abstinence
- abuse
- adoption
- adultery
- advertising
- afghanistan
- africa
- aging
- agriculture
- AIDS
- American Idol
- anglicanism
- animals
- apologetics
- art
- atheism
- authors
- babies
- beauty
- beauty pageants
- bible
- bigfamilies
- biology
- blasphemy
- blogs
- bodies
- body
- body image
- books
- breast cancer
- breast-feeding
- breastimplants
- business
- california
- cambodia
- career
- catholic church
- catholicism
- celibacy
- censorship
- charismatic movement
- children
- china
- christmas
- church life
- church-state
- churchhistory
- churchlife
- circumcision
- civility
- climate change
- clothing
- cohabitation
- compassion
- confession
- consumption
- contraception
- conversion
- cooking
- corruption
- cosmetics
- cosmeticsurgery
- counseling
- courts
- creation
- crime
- dalits
- dating
- death
- deaths
- deconversion
- democracy
- disability
- discipline
- disney
- divorce
- dogfighting
- down syndrome
- drugs
- economics
- economy
- education
- embryos
- empathy
- employment
- entertainment
- environment
- episcopal church
- ethics
- evangelicals
- evangelism
- eve
- evolution
- faith
- families
- family
- fashion
- fatherhood
- fathers
- feminism
- film
- finances
- florida
- food
- forgiveness
- friendship
- funding
- gardasil
- gender
- gifts
- girls
- grief
- happiness
- harry potter
- health
- healthcare
- higher education
- highereducation
- history
- homelessness
- homoesexuality
- homosexuality
- human rights
- humor
- hunger
- immigration
- india
- international politics
- internationalpolitics
- internet
- interview
- iran
- ireland
- islam
- israel
- IVF
- japan
- jerusalem
- jesus
- jimmy carter
- journalism
- judaism
- justice
- kissing
- language
- leaders
- leadership
- legislation
- libertyuniversity
- life ethics
- lifeethics
- literature
- local food
- loneliness
- lutherans
- mammograms
- marathon
- marriage
- mary
- media
- medicalethics
- memoir
- men
- mentoring
- michael vick
- midlife
- midwives
- ministry
- misogyny
- money and business
- moneyandbusiness
- morality
- mormonism
- motherhood
- mothers
- movies
- music
- natural disasters
- nature
- new york city
- news
- nonprofits
- northkorea
- notredame
- obama
- octuplets
- one-child policy
- one-upmomship
- onlinedating
- ordination
- orphans
- pantheism
- parachurch
- parenting
- pastors
- pentecostalism
- persecution
- plannedparenthood
- politics
- popebenedict
- population
- pornography
- poverty
- prayer
- pregnancy
- premarital counseling
- prison
- prostitution
- psychology
- publishing
- purity
- quiverfull
- race
- rape
- reading
- realitytv
- relationships
- religious freedom
- religiousfreedom
- research
- samesexmarriage
- sarah palin
- sarahpalin
- science
- sex
- sex education
- sex trafficking
- sexual abuse
- sexuality
- shopping
- singleness
- sisters
- slavery
- smoking
- sociology
- sotomayor
- south africa
- southernbaptists
- specialolympics
- spirituality
- sports
- stay-at-home dads
- STDs
- stem cell
- stem-cell research
- students
- studies
- sudan
- suffering
- summer
- supremecourt
- surgery
- surveys
- tattoos
- technology
- teenagers
- television
- terrorism
- thearts
- theology
- tithing
- top10
- toys
- transgenics
- TV
- twilight
- united nations
- violence
- war
- weddings
- weight
- wives
- women
- women of note
- women pastors
- womenleaders
- womenofnote
- womenpastors
- womensordination
- words
- work
- writing
- young adults
- youngadults
- youtube



Comments
Romans 15:5-7 (Amplified Bible)
5Now may the God Who gives the power of patient endurance (steadfastness) and Who supplies encouragement, grant you to live in such mutual harmony and such full sympathy with one another, in accord with Christ Jesus, 6That together you may [unanimously] with united hearts and one voice, praise and glorify the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ (the Messiah). 7Welcome and receive [to your hearts] one another, then, even as Christ has welcomed and received you, for the glory of God.
Posted By: Larry | November 18, 2009 11:50 AM
I've read several articles about this phenomenon among women, but I can't really identify. And I'm not sure why. But I've always just believed that "my way" is no better than "his way" and that my children will benefit from different perspectives and parenting styles. I do know that it is a problem for some mothers, though, and I hope that society continues to recognize the importance of contributions of both parents in the raising of children of all ages.
On the second topic, I agree that the comparison of spouse-love and child-love is like comparing apples to oranges. The love I have for my husband is SO DIFFERENT from the love I have for my children that to speak of loving one "more than" another strikes me as discordant. It's hard for me to articulate. I choose to love my husband based on our committment to one another. He is my partner, my lover, my best friend. I would not want to live my life without him. My love for my children is this all-consuming, powerful, thing that has no boundaries. It literally overcomes me at times. I could not stifle it if I wanted to. I can hardly imagine a scenario where I would have to choose between loving them, thank God.
Posted By: Robyn | November 18, 2009 2:27 PM
This reminds me of a study I heard about a long time ago:
An infant was placed in a crib in a room. The mother came to the doorway out of the baby's sight and spoke. Upon hearing the mother's voice, the baby behaved as though it was preparing to snuggle and perhaps nurse.
Then they did the same with the father. Upon hearing the father's voice, the baby's eyes, mouth, and arms opened wide with excitement and anticipation as though preparing to be tossed around.
Obviously, fathers snuggle and mothers play, but there seemed to be a recognition of a pattern of difference in mothering and fathering.
Posted By: Anonymous | November 19, 2009 10:45 AM
Two mothers can work just fine (see e.g. this article in the Times. What your story illustrates is that kids need parents who don't undermine each other. Framing it in ways that reinforce gender stereotypes doesn't help anyone.
Posted By: Liz W | November 19, 2009 11:00 AM
We are completely too child-centric in society today to the abject loss of relationship with our partner, lover, and best friend. We wake up years later when our kids are moving out of the house and don't even know one another. I think the partnership between the adults is the main thing! Then we are stronger and more grounded people who can love our kids. They don't need to be the center of our universe nor should they be. Come to think of it, isn't that God's job (center of the universe.) Great thoughts. Thank you for expressing them well.
Posted By: Melody Hanson | November 19, 2009 11:17 PM
I got your point but what about the opposite of this. What about if the father ignores the mother's input. Especially when they have grown out of there toddler years,and after decisions are made, tells her about them?
Posted By: Patricia | November 26, 2009 8:13 AM