What Is Her.meneutics?
The Christianity Today women's blog provides news and analysis from the perspective of evangelical women. We cover news stories and books related to international justice and evangelism, pregnancy and sexual ethics, marriage, parenting, and celibacy, pop culture, health and body image, raising girls, and women in the church and parachurch.Her.meneutics is edited by associate editor Katelyn Beaty and online editor Sarah Pulliam Bailey.
Free Newsletters
books we're reading
« Pregnant Olympians Are Not 'Selfish' | Main | Eliminating Suffering or Eliminating People? »
February 25, 2010Why Boys Are Failing in the Classroom
The author of Why Boys Fail says females now have an unfair academic advantage in most schools — and that the pendulum needs to swing back.
Michelle Van Loon, guest blogger
True or false: Our educational system gives boys an academic advantage.
Answer: A resounding yes, when Leave It To Beaver was the TV ratings champ. But Richard Whitmire, author of Why Boys Fail: Saving Our Sons From An Educational System That’s Leaving Them Behind (Amacon Publishing, 2010), makes a compelling, well-documented case that the opposite is now true. According to Whitmire, male students have been at a disadvantage for at least a generation, and the academic gender gap is widening.
Whitmire, a former editorial writer for USA Today, marshaled an impressive amount of research to support the thesis of his book: “The world has gotten more verbal, boys haven’t." He insists that instructional trends ranging from whole language reading instruction (emphasizing the recognition of words in context versus the decoding skills employed in phonics training) to math education that focuses on analyzing and solving word problems play to girls’ strengths.
The grim stats cut like a machete through every demographic: urban, rural, wealthy, and underserved boys alike are lagging behind their female peers. Whether it is an abnormally high percentage of elementary-age boys labeled "behavior problems," or the 60/40 percent female-male imbalance as the status quo on many college campuses, the female academic advantage has been a game-changer for an entire generation of children, says Whitmire.
“. . . I bought into the reports that schools were treating girls unfairly, shunting them aside in favor of aggressive boys thrusting their arms in the air to answer teachers’ questions . . . by hindsight, we now know that research was flawed. I was wrong to write those stories.” Why Boys Fail is more than Whitmire's mea culpa, however. It profiles promising pilot programs and suggests solutions ranging from big-picture federal studies to micro-level classroom teachers committed to providing boy-friendly books and (even) graphic novels as reading material for male students.
Will a systemic intervention mean that female students have to lose the ground they have gained? Whitmire says no: “Reaching out to help young men will in the long run help women as well. Anyone who doubts that needs to sit down and have a chat with Oprah about the damage the looming gender gaps have inflicted on the African American community. If national feminist groups change their position, so will the two national teachers unions.”
However, those higher-ups may prove to be the most resistant to Whitmire's conclusions. Many have bought into the “boys have the academic advantages” paradigm, and have shaped education to fit it. Whitmire, the father of two daughters, believes that both boys and girls can succeed — but not without intentional construction of a new, inclusive paradigm that affirms (celebrates, even!) gender differences.
I read Why Boys Fail with interest. My husband and I home-schooled our daughter and two sons, all of whom are now young adults. Our kitchen became a classroom when our school district jumped on the whole language bandwagon in the late 1980s. Though gender bias had nothing to do with our decision at the time, the research presented in Whitmire’s book validated what I observed in my own home. I learned early on that I needed to tailor both the material and my approach so that it would connect with each of my kids. Their gender differences played a role in that tailoring process.
Whitmire’s ideas are provocative, to be sure, and some educators will dismiss the book as a call to return to an era where Dick, Jane, Spot and Puff taught children to read, and boys enjoyed unfair academic advantages. This misses the point of Why Boys Fail, which is a well-written invitation to begin a new and necessary conversation about creating an academic environment that is fundamentally just, in order to ensure that no child, male or female, gets left behind.
Michelle Van Loon is the author of two books on the parables of Jesus, and blogs at TheParableLife.blogspot.com. A shorter review of this book can be found at Englewood Review of Books.
Posted by Katelyn Beaty on February 25, 2010 9:05 AM
recent posts
tags
- abortion
- abstinence
- abuse
- activism
- adoption
- adultery
- advertising
- afghanistan
- africa
- aging
- AIDS
- alcoholism
- American Idol
- anglicanism
- animals
- anorexia
- art
- atheism
- athletes
- authors
- autism
- babies
- barbie
- beauty
- beauty pageants
- beth moore
- bible
- birth control
- blasphemy
- body image
- book club
- books
- boycotts
- breast cancer
- breastfeeding
- burqa
- business
- cambodia
- cancer
- career
- catholicism
- catholics
- CCM
- celibacy
- censorship
- chick flicks
- childhood
- children
- china
- christmas
- church history
- church life
- church-state
- churchlife
- circumcision
- clothing
- cohabitation
- college
- community
- confession
- consumption
- contraception
- conversion
- cooking
- cosmetic surgery
- cosmetics
- counseling
- courts
- craigslist
- creation
- crime
- dads
- dating
- daughters
- death
- deaths
- deconversion
- depression
- disability
- discipleship
- discipline
- disney
- divorce
- domestic violence
- doubt
- doulas
- down syndrome
- drugs
- easter
- eat pray love
- eating
- eating disorders
- economy
- education
- embryos
- empathy
- employment
- entertainment
- environment
- ethics
- evangelicalism
- evangelicals
- evangelism
- evolution
- exercise
- faith
- family
- fashion
- fasting
- fatherhood
- fathers
- fear
- feminism
- film
- finances
- food
- forgiveness
- friendship
- gender
- girls
- grief
- haiti
- halloween
- happiness
- harry potter
- health
- health care
- higher education
- hindu
- history
- homelessness
- homeschooling
- homosexuality
- hookup culture
- hospitality
- human rights
- humor
- hutterites
- immigration
- india
- infertility
- international politics
- internet
- interview
- iran
- iraq
- islam
- israel
- IVF
- ivf
- japan
- jesus
- journalism
- judaism
- justice
- kissing
- language
- lawsuit
- leaders
- leadership
- legislation
- lent
- life ethics
- loneliness
- makeup
- mammograms
- marriage
- media
- memoir
- men
- menopause
- mentoring
- michele bachmann
- michelle obama
- midlife
- ministry
- miscarriage
- missions
- modesty
- mormonism
- motherhood
- mothers
- movies
- multitasking
- music
- natural disasters
- nonprofits
- north korea
- nuns
- obama
- octuplets
- one-child policy
- onlinedating
- orphans
- outreach
- pain
- parachurch
- parenting
- pastors
- pentecostalism
- persecution
- philosophy
- planned parenthood
- politics
- pornography
- poverty
- prayer
- pregnancy
- premarital counseling
- prison
- privacy
- prostitution
- psychology
- race
- rape
- reading
- relationships
- religious freedom
- research
- romance
- sabbath
- samesexmarriage
- sarah palin
- science
- scripture
- sex addiction
- sex trafficking
- sexting
- sexual abuse
- sexuality
- shopping
- singleness
- sisters
- slavery
- smoking
- sociology
- sotomayor
- sperm donation
- spirituality
- sports
- stay-at-home dads
- STDs
- stem-cell research
- students
- studies
- sudan
- suffering
- suicide
- supremecourt
- surveys
- tattoos
- technology
- teenagers
- teens
- television
- terrorism
- thanksgiving
- theology
- tithing
- top 10
- trafficking
- travel
- twilight
- violence
- volunteering
- war
- weddings
- weight
- widows
- women
- women of note
- women pastors
- women's ministry
- work
- worship
- writing
- yoga
- young adults
- youtube
Archives
February 2012January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009



Comments
I home school my four children, two boys and two girls. Yes, they learn differently. One size does not fit all. I am so thankful that I can teach them at home and tailor the material to their learning styles.
Posted By: Leslie | February 25, 2010 11:25 AM
And just to throw this out there...I had two of each. Each one of them learned differently. And there were greater differences between my two sons' learning styles than between either of them and their sisters.
We are ALL different and gender is only a piece of the puzzle not the whole thing.
Posted By: Tami | February 25, 2010 12:04 PM
What this show me more than anything else is the need for tailored small group instruction. My wife is a third grade teacher that does 90 percent of her day in small group instruction. It is all tailored to where that particular child is at. Children move in and out of groups frequently based on skills and needs. Each child receives at least one math and at least one reading lesson a day with no more than 3 other students. Some may receive as many as three short reading lessons a day.
What it requires is a highly organized motivated teacher, a lot of skills assessment (computerized skill assessment is a must) and relatively small class sizes. Right now a significant portion of the education community is just not capable of doing small group instruction in this manner. But it is the way that children, especially low income children, will learn best.
Posted By: Adam Shields | February 25, 2010 12:26 PM
This is an old argument, and, of course, there's a whole other side to this story:
"A study to be released today looking at long-term trends in test scores and academic success argues that widespread reports of U.S. boys being in crisis are greatly overstated and that young males in school are in many ways doing better than ever.
Using data compiled from the National Assessment of Educational Progress, a federally funded accounting of student achievement since 1971, the Washington-based think tank Education Sector found that, over the past three decades, boys' test scores are mostly up, more boys are going to college and more are getting bachelor's degrees.
Although low-income boys, like low-income girls, are lagging behind middle-class students, boys are scoring significant gains in elementary and middle school and are much better prepared for college, the report says. It concludes that much of the pessimism about young males seems to derive from inadequate research, sloppy analysis and discomfort with the fact that although the average boy is doing better, the average girl has gotten ahead of him.
"The real story is not bad news about boys doing worse," the report says, "it's good news about girls doing better. ...
The "boy crisis," the report says, has been used by conservative authors who accuse "misguided feminists" of lavishing resources on female students at the expense of males and by liberal authors who say schools are "forcing all children into a teacher-led pedagogical box that is particularly ill-suited to boys' interests and learning styles."
"Yet there is not sufficient evidence -- or the right kind of evidence -- available to draw firm conclusions," the report says. "As a result, there is a sort of free market for theories about why boys are underperforming girls in school, with parents, educators, media, and the public choosing to give credence to the explanations that are the best marketed and that most appeal to their pre-existing preferences." "
Wash. Post 6/26/06 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/25/AR2006062501047.html
This Slate article is more comprehensive. http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:9HL0uwjt_BUJ:www.slate.com/id/2135243/+whitmire+%22national+assessment+of+educational+progress%22&cd=7&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
Posted By: Christian Lawyer | February 26, 2010 1:25 AM
I once served as an administrator in a small town high school in which several hundred students graduated each year. Of those, the school selected 12 valedictorians. One year in particular I remember of the 12 valedictorians, 11 were females. And this was pretty much the norm every year. Did it reflect a "boy" problem? I don't think so. We consistently had boys involved in many school activities where they performed excellently. I now work in an urban school district and I see the same pattern here: girls tend to excel academically while boys not so much. Now here we do have a "boy" problem: they drop out of school, they do drugs, and they fight and kill each other. And the girls? Not so much.
Posted By: Dan | February 26, 2010 11:39 AM
Christian Lawyer wrote: “This is an old argument, and, of course, there's a whole other side to this story.”
I’m glad Christian Lawyer has apparently come to the realization that there's a “whole other side” to any story.
The article she cites is an older, 2006 study which was generally inconclusive as to why school curricula appear to be less conducive to male learning vs female learning. The 2006 Slate article she referenced is the same study as viewed through the leftist prism of Slate magazine (in angrily slamming conservative sources she conveniently and hypocritically leaves out the leftist bias of sources, like Slate and the ACLU, that she so often cites).
I think it is factual to say that the state of male education is cause for concern, all the way through the college level. Of particular note is the high percentage of male high school dropouts, especially in minority communities, and the dwindling number of males who appear interested in going to college. We know there is a strong correlation between educational non-achievement and incarceration. Society pays a heavy price for not providing educational opportunities for at-risk males.
But this has not been and should not be an exclusive concern of ideologues. The data from Whitmire is heavily quantitative, more conclusive and more recent than the 2006 Education Sector analysis. Additionally, Whitmire’s prior ideological predispositions, if he had any, were more sympathetic to the left.
By childishly reducing these concerns to an ideological face-off we waste even more time in coming up with solutions. We ignore these educational red flags at our own peril.
Posted By: Truthmeister | February 27, 2010 5:12 PM
I think it is unfair to try to label little things like switching away from phonics(which I personally believe to be detrimental in all ways) as part of the problem.
Or to imply that education today favors girls and we must put a stop to that and bring it back on the boys side.
That is almost Victorian in thought, and a tad bit jealous. As a girl I kept up with and could easily pass the boys in all things including sports at a time when things were slanted the other way.
How?
Motivation, being inspired, knowing that if you could grasp the basics the rest was easy. Learn to read and there was nothing you couldn't teach yourself, learn what I wanted to learn. It starts in 1st grade, at the beginning.
So much for biased, eh?
The fact is today they don't really give the kids anything to motivate them to want to go to school and learn, other than having computers and free internet access. You've got to give computers credit for sparking greater interest in reading, typing, and programming than before.
What happened to vocational classes, music and sports? Things that even if they dropped out would still be useful in making a living. And wasn't that the whole point in getting an education, to be able to make a decent living?
Over the years too many budget cuts and school closings killed many of those programs. What are they going to school for? Kids go because they have to, because there is no way around it, it's forced on them, they don't have to like it or feel they need it. They get no matter what for at least the first 8-9 years.
Bored kids don't learn, pushing them to excel to go to college isn't much of a motivation either.
Give them something they can really sink their teeth into, something that gets them fired up, eager to stay in school, something that would be useful in life, making a living, starting their own business, something that serves a purpose.
I wish homeschooling had been available for my kids, I would have taught them so much more, things that they would have gotten credit for. I taught that having your own business was the way to go.
Had them run a soda business out of our kitchen. My kids learned more from that in a week than in a semester of economics, bookkeeping, marketing, management and math classes!
At 15 I met an occupational therapist, I was shown around her dept and I fell in love with this line of work. Why? because it would incorporate all the things I loved to do, art, crafts, hospitals and helping people get well.
I researched all the classes I would need to take to become an occupational therapist.
I had a goal that didn't focus on writing term papers or reading Shakespeare and Poe. I could relate to this, I could see myself doing this, and being happy in my career.
And that made Shakespeare and Poe bearable to finish.
In the movie "Peggy Sue Got Married" Peggy told her algebra teacher that she knew for certain that in her life she would never use algebra again.
Anybody see my point?
It's not a girl vs boy deal, girls find school a little more interesting than boys when there are no sports, drama, band or music classes available.
They all need exciting science and math classes, classes that teach them how to survive and flourish out in the world.
We lost schools with focus, with the idea that learning was the bridge to greater things, better things and jobs beyond working for somebody else for the rest of their lives.
When parent began to look down on vocational educational and allow those programs to be cut, they forgot that the world still needs plumbers, electricians, carpenters, and welders. We need trained people to repair and build thing, keep the equipment running. We need scientists to improve our machines and systems.
We have to give them some really good reasons for sticking it out 12 thru high school and another 4 for college.
If not all they will do is go the minimum time and drop out.
School will become a prison sentence with no time off for good behavior.
Posted By: Cherise | February 28, 2010 10:42 AM
"...And that made Shakespeare and Poe bearable to finish."
What? Shakespeare only bearable? Heretic! Poe only bearable? Philistine! May God have mercy on your utilitarian soul! ;-P
A Thing of Beauty (Endymion)
A thing of beauty is a joy for ever:
Its lovliness increases; it will never
Pass into nothingness; but still will keep
A bower quiet for us, and a sleep
Full of sweet dreams, and health, and quiet breathing.
Therefore, on every morrow, are we wreathing
A flowery band to bind us to the earth,
Spite of despondence, of the inhuman dearth
Of noble natures, of the gloomy days,
Of all the unhealthy and o'er-darkn'd ways
Made for our searching: yes, in spite of all,
Some shape of beauty moves away the pall
From our dark spirits. Such the sun, the moon,
Trees old and young, sprouting a shady boon
For simple sheep; and such are daffodils
With the green world they live in; and clear rills
That for themselves a cooling covert make
'Gainst the hot season; the mid-forest brake,
Rich with a sprinkling of fair musk-rose blooms:
And such too is the grandeur of the dooms
We have imagined for the mighty dead;
An endless fountain of immortal drink,
Pouring unto us from the heaven's brink.
-Keats
Read this poem 10 times today and ask forgiveness from the Muse and your sin will be absolved.
Posted By: Dan | March 1, 2010 7:20 AM
It's one thing to point out that this article completely ignores serious, contradictory analysis. It's entirely another to falsely state, as TM did on another thread, that a judge, after a trial at which each side put on all the evidence they believed necessary to a full and complete analysis, "necessarily lacked" all the facts. One is encouragement of a search for truth, and the other is just a completely false statement of fact.
It would also be a lot more credible if those who are so worried now about the "crisis" for boys had expressed one whit of concern for the girls. Calling those who called for an end to discrimination against girls in college admissions "red-faced militants screaming" for equality lacks any sense of reasoned analysis.
Posted By: Christian Lawyer | March 2, 2010 7:04 AM
The "red-faced" feminists to which I referred, incorrectly interpreted by the self-styled "Christian Lawyer,” were those that had more of a bone to pick with the male gender than they had a desire to help the female gender.
Christian Lawyer posits that my argument "lacks any sense of reasoned analysis.” Well, now. I think Christian Lawyer may serve as the poster child for the notion that “reasoned analysis” is totally lost on those who apparently lack the capacity or will to appreciate it.
Christian Lawyer further surmised: "It would also be a lot more credible if those who are so worried now about the "crisis" for boys had expressed one whit of concern for the girls."
Actually, they did. Many of the same folks voicing concern now not only expressed more than a "whit" of concern about the girls, they were at the forefront of the movement for equitable treatment of girls. Some are now mothers of sons and it's that same concern for equitable treatment that’s motivating their actions now.
Before departing on her heroic “search for truth” Christian Lawyer, as is her custom, forgot to pack a couple of essentials: fairness and objectivity.
Posted By: Truthmeister | March 2, 2010 4:13 PM
loss of a family member may be concerned that many may try to establish some point in their lives. Several have decided to use a lot of questions and situations in the coming months and generally meets the cremation ashes of the DEA. Select a pub, as there bee cremated loved to sleep with other issues related to management remains a challenge families.This ashes on the type of links of London charms is finished a links of london charms links of london charms x wonderful gift for almost any woman or lady. Be aware of alternative products available, it is important for families who need support during this period.
Cremation is a process burning his body in the twentieth game and lower your body so links of london charms y small t ashes.This invention can majority of links of London on sale in the U.S. UK flexibility to set every time you want. Employed as an alternative to burial of the body in a coffin much intact body of the common man "opened ranged high wit crematorium furnace structure and soft organs of the body usually evaporates from. Residual heat bone fragments and burning lungs, and b further reduced by cremulator The typical average weight of ash from 4 ° -.. without mature ash are usually returned in the next number in the family box, or even some other pot and a certificate for cremation.
Posted By: asdfgt20l | February 11, 2012 4:55 PM